zbyte64

Obviously it's just Trump in a Biden suit running things at this point. Think about it, you never actually see the two of them in the same room, the guy we saw on the debate was actually Jim Carrey. In conclusion, a vote for Biden is a vote for Trump.

o7

With the way Biden is going... They probably won't need to 🤦‍♂️

You're right, I answered the question I wished was asked: whether they're planning bloodshed.

What's to stop the ~~monkey paw~~ SCOTUS from simply interpreting a large hole in the amendment?

And I dont really care what people claim or what way you guys are misleading.

I also like to shout into a void for a sense of validation.

I don't think you can approximate Turing complete algorithms though. And then you end up with a situation where the simulation is making these Turing machines out of other simulated components, so it's even more overhead then just giving the simulated agents direct CPU time.

Those stocks won't buy back themselves!

Here's a writer of Project 2025 saying there won't bloodshed as long as you don't resist: https://youtu.be/-OdM4_WO2wk

I'll crap down anyone's throat if it means my life is just a little bit more comfortable. Thank you for empathizing with my plight and arguing that a golf course is more important than public green spaces.

Nah, more like some dead family members from gang violence (I had a dumb but lovable cousin). But you're right, I can't really say whether they're dieing for a cause, I meant it more as "dieing for a lesser cause" than emancipation.