132
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Does this explain the bullet cluster? If it doesn't, it's kinda useless.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 23 points 3 days ago

the current theory is โ€œnot by itself sufficient to discredit the dark matter hypothesis โ€” it could be an interesting mathematical exercise at best, but it is the first proof that gravity can exist without mass,โ€ he added.

(Quote by the author of the study himself)

It's a purely mathematical construct that could explain bending of light without mass.

[-] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Sure, I'm blaming the concerned journalist(s) here. It's rlly scummy to hype up an evidenceless hypothesis like this. Does injustice to both, the scientists and the public.

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 10 points 3 days ago

Typical, scientist: "My paper does NOT say THIS". Press: "Scientist claims THIS!"

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

To be fair dark matter is a purely mathematical construct to explain the presence of gravity without (visible) mass. Certainly dark matter has more credibility than this new idea but hypothetical mathematical constructs make up a good chunk of physics.

[-] Tobberone@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

But per the definition given involving negative mass, it should be "meassurable mass in the presence of exotic matter". Anywho...

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 3 days ago

I mean, cool to prove a theory of massless gravity though, whatever their motivation.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago

You say that about everything

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
132 points (90.2% liked)

Futurology

1737 readers
66 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS