this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)
libre
9839 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to libre
A comm dedicated to the fight for free software with an anti-capitalist perspective.
The struggle for libre computing cannot be disentangled from other forms of socialist reform. One must be willing to reject proprietary software as fiercely as they would reject capitalism. Luckily, we are not alone.
Resources
- Free Software, Free Society provides an excellent primer in the origins and theory around free software and the GNU Project, the pioneers of the Free Software Movement.
- Switch to GNU/Linux! If you're still using Windows in
$CURRENT_YEAR, flock to Linux Mint!; Apple Silicon users will want to check out Asahi Linux.
Rules
- Be on topic: Posts should be about free software and other hacktivst struggles. Topics about general tech news should be in the technology comm or programming comm. That doesn't mean all posts have to be serious though, memes are welcome!
- Avoid using misleading terms/speading misinformation: Here's a great article about what those words are. In short, try to avoid parroting common Techbro lingo and topics.
- Avoid being confrontational: People are in different stages of liberating their computing, focus on informing rather than accusing. Debatebro nonsense is not tolerated.
- All site-wide rules still apply
Artwork
- Xenia was meant to be an alternative to Tux and was created (licensed under CC0) by Alan Mackey in 1996.
- Comm icon (of Xenia the Linux mascot) was originally created by @ioletsgo
- Comm banner is a close up of "Dorlotons Degooglisons" by David Revoy (CC-BY 4.0) for Framasoft
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'll refrain from making any solid claims; There are clearly some actual examples of concerning behaviour and trash opinions from the guy, but in honesty, this report reads to me a hit piece rather than investigative journalism. It makes some seemingly objectively false claims, and some other claims I'd be interesting in hearing more on.
Stallman has done a lot of good work, and it sounds like he really should shut his yap about non FSF-business more than anything (which the paper does call for).
It kinda sucks to say "pretty sure some of these claims are objectively false" and refuse to say which ones.
Stallman's otherwise good work isn't really a factor in how I feel about this, it doesn't buy him a pass. But I do agree its probably a bit of a hitpiece
I kept vague because I'm not really eager to get into any arguments over specific details. I obviously could be wrong.
I'm not saying he deserves "a pass" (whatever that entails), I'm not defending his character. I just don't really think his dumb opinions are relevant to his professional work.
yeah but then like, don't post about it? idk. If you aren't willing to discuss it then why do the rest of us need to hear your opinion? it's a conversation-terminator.
Not sure I'm comfortable making that kind of distinction where we let people just be shitbags and continue to occupy prominent and revered positions in our communities/orgs. I know that's not exactly what you're saying, but I think it's where the distinction being drawn often leads.
Then don't post about it, yourself?? It was very deliberately a conversation-terminator, I'm not interested in a conversation about it.
I agree with not being fully comfortable about that kind of distinction. I don't think we should let people be as shitbags, but I also don't understand why a person in a prominent position needs to not have bad opinions on irrelevant topics.