Wizard, wizard, and wizard. Sometimes I'll be a warrior, then I'll immediately give up and and be a wizard.
A table that could describe maybe all organisations and ideologies ever.
- Believe various things, some optimistic, some pessimistic
- talk to each other
- like 1+ persons from history
- 2+ violent persons have used their label, and
- discuss their beliefs/hate being violently attacked.
Krebs krebs krebs cycle! It's all I remember.
Wait, how different is botany from biology? Maybe you should study shades of green.
I think it gets overused, especially where the meaning is otherwise still very clear or it was just obviously a typo or quick mistake. I think there's room for semantic pedantry when someone is genuinely being ambiguous, though.
I do it though, and at least in my personal life, it really helps me to clear up meanings where I genuinely don't understand what people mean. It's hard to ride the line of "Do you mean x?" or "I assume you mean x" without coming across as condescending, but I really do plead that it has a place. And I can only apologise for times when i am , I don't always do it perfectly, but what will seem to others as me having an annoying focus on minor detail, or being overly prescriptivist, is actually a habit that serves me well and helps me communicate better, so I don't intend to stop.
Being a pedant for the sole purpose of just arguing over nothing, like the indigenous example you provide though, I agree is silly.
Paid by whom tho?
It's really fun to see users on here who declare they came from elsewhere in the Lemmyverse, ignored the boogyman narrative, had a cool conversation with our valiant posters, and eventually decided we were so friendly and welcoming that they wanted to stay. I see someone declaring that basically every week now, it's great to see the proof that you can actually have more comrades by means of nice conversations Those posters warm my heart.
Yes yes, that's the boring stuff, where does the profit and forcible extraction of others' money come in?
What weird American terminology is a "forgivable" loan? Is that a grant with extra steps? Or a recognition that no loan scheme works and they'll eventually have to give up chasing repayment on half of them?
Not really relevant to your point, but the game wasn't developed by Paradox, they published it.
By my estimation, it would only take a single wind turbine 130km in diameter to generate an average 3TW to supply all electricity in the whole world. How long 'til we get a turbine that big?