121
It's quite telling that liberals have to defend Kamala by using hypotheticals (hexbear.net)
submitted 6 days ago by corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net to c/electoralism@hexbear.net
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Arguing with liberals on the internet this morning, and whenever I make a simple more stance that "I refuse to vote for a genocide facilitator" I'm met by nothing but "what if's".

"Ok but what if our choices were XYZ"

"But what if trump does this?"

It doesn't fuckin matter to me, im not casting my vote for either of them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 36 points 6 days ago

"OK but what if your party stopped actively committing genocide?" Either you fucking need my vote or you don't, and my conditions are clear. Meet them or fuck off forever.

[-] REgon@hexbear.net 7 points 6 days ago

If they lose, then it's your fault. If they win, then they never needed your vote

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
121 points (96.2% liked)

electoralism

21979 readers
110 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net