this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
336 points (96.7% liked)

Today I Learned

17785 readers
399 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And yes, I'm also shocked and saddened that there is a Caillou fandom site.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 62 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

reading that list, they just didnt like airing normal but negative young-chlid behavior. gotta keep it sterile, dontchaknow

no taking toys, no throwing tantrums. no pointing out when your parents are exhausted.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 103 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree with what you're saying in principle, but I don't think toddlers need realistic depictions of toddlers on TV to emulate.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i thought the point of the show was to depict real world solutions to those problematic behaviors, which the show seemed to do well. it wasnt just kids being jerks and 'fini'

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 112 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but toddlers aren't too bright. You show Caillou throwing sand in his friend's eyes, they might copy that even if Caillou learned his lesson. Because they didn't learn Caillou's lesson.

Toddlers have a lot of difficulty putting themselves in someone else's shoes, but very little trouble copying behavior they see on TV.

I mean I didn't show my kid Caillou in the first place because he's an annoying little shit and why would I have when there's an internet full of classic Sesame Street and Mr. Rogers for her to watch? Between that and Blue's Clues, we were pretty set with stuff to keep her entertained during TV time.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

i had no problem showing this kind of stuff to my 4 kids oh so long ago. i dont recall anything negative happening because of it. its definitely not, 'set them in front and walk away material'.. parents need to be present to explain stuff to the very young.

i also had the classics, but they seem to gravitate towards spongebob as their long term favorite even as they aged.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This might just come down to the kids too. My eldest would likely be like yours and pick up the lesson ,but my youngest would 1000% emulate the bad behavior, dodge the lesson, and think it was funny that he got the same consequences as the kid on tv.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I would have learned the lesson then emulated the behavior anyway because I was a little shit.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's unlikely that they got enough complaints to remove those episodes from rebroadcasts if kids weren't imitating his behavior.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Broadcasters are weak willed and the people complaining about things are usually Karens. And since Karens bitch loudly, they often get their way just so they will shut the fuck up.

Just look at some of the things the MPAA considers as essentially requirements to force things into a higher rating tier. They're basically just applying puritanical beliefs into the ratings to try and appease Karens, regardless of reality. And even those are applied wildly inconsistently.

The Kings Speech was given an R rating for language. The word Fuck is used several times in one scene ina. Medical context of speech therapy. Meanwhile, Gunner Palace, a documentary about soldiers in the Iraq War, uses the word Fuck 42 times, twice in a sexual context, and was only rated PG-13.

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

“I had no problem running a mile so people with broken legs should be just fine too”

I’m just poking fun. I think most leftists would agree parents should be present and engaging with young children during screen time. But maybe, just maybe it’s good to show a role model that behaves instead of being a little shit.

There is currently an epidemic of objectively cognitively impaired long-COVID stricken iPad kids literally ruining the teaching industry. Many households have both adults working 12 hour days just to make ends meet. Many others have time but don't give a shit.

An entire generation was just ruined by lifelong mental disability and being raised by iPad autoplay and nobody gives a shit. Well, it makes it easier for me to get good jobs but mark my words, in 10-20 more years we’re going to be in some serious shit.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean, it doesn't really matter if you don't think toddlers need realistic depictions, if it's running that means that toddlers are watching it or the parents of toddlers want realistic depictions.

What should they be watching? Superheroes? Other toddlers that behave like perfect angels? I'm sure there are enough other options out there, if they were watching those all the time then the realistic depictions wouldn't be on air still. I remember watching Caillou and that was like 25 years ago, so obviously it's probably doing something right.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Caillou was doing something right... except in the multiple episodes where they decided not to rebroadcast because they got too many complaints.

I really don't think showing a toddler a kid on TV throwing sand in another kid's face is a good idea even if that kid on TV learns that it's bad. Not when there's enough parents not watching the show with their kids.

Yes you can certainly blame the parents for that, but that's not much comfort to the parents of the other kid who got sand in their eyes that wouldn't have if the first kid didn't think of the idea after watching Caillou do it.

I don't think anyone would suggest that Sesame Street or Mr. Rogers were doing wrong things overall just because there were also episodes of those shows that they decided to never rebroadcast.

https://collider.com/mister-rogers-neighborhood-lost-episodes-controversy/

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

One episode he punches a baby. That is like number 1 on the list of things you don't punch. There are the obvious examples of types of babies that are ok to punch. E.g. zombie, demon, Hitler, etc.

[–] SmokumJoe@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Punching a knife might be worse

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Medically yes. Morally, maybe not.

[–] rocketpoweredredneck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That depends, is this knife a baby?

[–] SmokumJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Or a baby threatening me with a knife

[–] mydoomlessaccount@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A baby made of horribly caustic acid that is actively moving toward other babies, and all you have available to stop it is punches. Good to punch, or bad to punch? 🤔

(The baby is much faster than you. It will reach the other babies before you can. It is about to pass you, though it hasn't yet done so, and all you have time to do is to give it a quick, decisive strike to knock it off-course)

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dang it, so close hahaha