this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
529 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19239 readers
1880 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They won't be able to implement half of it just due to the bureaucracy of the system fighting against any kind of big change. The part they do manage to ram through will be damaging enough, though.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Do you know what Project 2025 is? Part of the plan involves removing the bureaucracy and replacing them with Trump loyalists and sycophants

That's if they replace them at all, as in many cases they will be eliminating regulatory agencies entirely.

I hope things like NPR can survive when their funds are finally cut entirely, as at this point the larger stations have enough donors to stay afloat. I hope.

[–] frezik@midwest.social -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yes, I'm aware. Still doesn't matter. They can start down that path, and then they'll find out how hard it actually is to get the US government bureaucracy to change anything. Infighting among those "loyalists" will also bog it all down.

They're being chosen for loyalty first, and competence a distant second. It's not going to work.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're clearly not aware. The bureaucracy is being removed entirely. It won't be there anymore to be an obstacle.

[–] frezik@midwest.social -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's fundamentally not how it works. The bureaucracy must exist to a certain extent. Running a country of 330M people and $25T GDP without it is ludicrous. People must exist in all that who can actually do the work and not just be yes men.

They'll make a lot of press for the first year or so of firing people and trying to replace them. Some of those replacements will back out, and positions will go unfilled. Then the consequences of not having the old guard around will start to sink in, and the whole project will grind against itself.

To be clear, none of this is good. Those consequences won't be confined to the people causing the problems. Not even close. But it will mitigate the damage from a full implementation of Project 2025.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The bureaucracy must exist to a certain extent.

I think you're missing that the GOP has been in "burn it all down" mode for 16 years. They don't want a functioning government, they think government gets in the way of a libertarian utopia (Vance's own words).

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, I'm saying that very factor will kill the whole project. They don't understand how any of it works, why it has to work the way it does (at least to some extent), and things will go wrong because of it. As those things pile up, it's going to be increasingly clear that they are creating more problems than they're solving, and they will have to spend increasingly amounts of time solving those problems rather than moving the project forward.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They don't care if it creates problems because they'll explain it away as short term, transition, private market will solve it because the private market solves everything, etc. That's the point of "burn it all down", they don't care. Everything will go wrong in our eyes, but in their eyes it's not wrong.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. Certain things have to be done correctly. Orwellian Rightthink doesn't work in the long run; you can say that 2+2=5 all you want, but if you're making a car, it has to be 4. This will affect the billionaire Republican donors, and then they'll start caring.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry but you're seriously missing the point: they don't care.

All these things you care about working correctly, they don't care. To them it doesn't have to be done correctly. To them it doesn't have to be done at all. To them the magical private sector will solve it. Republican donors will probably profit off it.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When Musk starts losing rockets due to bad weather data out of the husk of NOAA, will they start caring then? Reality has a way of forcing the issue.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No they won't. I'm serious, they don't care. If things going "wrong" it just means they haven't privatized enough and haven't burned down the government enough.

Reality? They don't live in reality.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Tell me… how many of those bureaucrats are going to “slow things down” when they stop getting paid and their workplace is sold out from under them?

They can sue in court… and those lawsuits will be rejected.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They have control of all three branches of government. No checks. No balances.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

All 3 branches, Trump will have all yes men in his administration, and this time he benefits from his 4 prior years of stacking the courts.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not good enough. Even winding down an agency, like NOAA (fully planned as part of Project 2025), takes effort. These people don't have any appreciation for how they'll pull one thread and find it's connected to a hundred other threads. Trump personally lacks the attention span to put any effort into it, and the people underneath him will jockey for position and work at cross purposes.

It's not a lot of comfort right now, but fascism is self-defeating.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the major saving grace of it.

Something like NOAA really requires a lot of experts to run, and get value from. If they replace it with loyalists, privatize it, or just stop funding it all together it's entire benefit will end.

I can list a ton of impacts to NOAA benefits ending: National Weather Service likely gets privatized

  1. only premium users get the 24/7 continuous weather updates from NWR broadcasts (radio weather updates).

3.NWWS (basically used for severe weather monitoring) now has fees or is gone.

  1. EWIN means no more emergency weather coordination.

  2. Weather.gov is shut down or prioritized.

That means immediately we have disasters in all farming communities from lower crop yields. The tornado belt will get deadlier. You can just forget about living in Florida. It will be very expensive to fly because airlines no longer receive that data. More destructive forest fires. Incoming and outgoing sea shipping will become much more expensive and dangerous (more expensive imports, exports, seafood, off shore oil).

Not to mention space weather is in the realm of NOAA. Satellite and radio comms will be difficult to account for. Geomagnetic storms will cause infrastructure damage when operators of pipelines and power grids can't prepare for the induced surges.

That's just a tiny list. I like sort collectively acknowledge - Maga is a cult of Death. It doesnt matter who or why, they just want to cull the human population.

What's sort of funny to me is the conspiracy about our leaders being lizard people makes more since if the Project 2025 people are actually aliens going about in a systemic way to remove us from the planet for themselves. A la "They Live" style.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It really is just a recipe to destroy all functioning systems. It doesnt make any sense unless you want to absolutely wreck a country.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Mr Musk fired 80% of the Twitter staff. Pretty sure there was no organized wind down, it's just gone. That's how he thinks it works.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't part of it about firing anyone that gets in their way? Schedule F provisions?

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The people saying there are protections to prevent this don't understand just how bad this is. They co trol everything. The United States just became a 1 party country because assholes stayed home to protest shit that is only going to get exponentially worse under trump. They forgot the lessons of his first term.