this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
493 points (87.4% liked)

Political Memes

5425 readers
2217 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The DNC allowed Obama to be the nominee because they were assured he would back off on progressive policy and institute corporate friendly programs like the ACA. For the DNC him being the first black president was a suitable surrogate to progressive change.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ACA was watered down because of Lieberman.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

Obama chose to oust Dean over the public option, which facilitated Lieberman's success in that endeavour, so yeah that is accurate to say.

Howard Dean was the hiccup in the DNC after 2004 when Kerry and Edwards went for the ticket. He got control of the DNC (being 3rd) and got the party to run on healthcare reform and a public option in all 50 states. The moment Obama took control Dean was removed and the signal was given the public option would not be fought for.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He was all in on the public option. They really were blindsided by him.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the thing that's hard to determine: if he gave up because of Lieberman or if Lieberman was the cover for backing off.

I didn't think so at the time, but given the track record and actions of the party since then? I kinda do feel Obama wasn't so all-in for it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No, it was pretty clear. And if it was a cover then it was the party telling Obama he couldn't have it. He'd never have proposed it if he didn't want it on the table.