this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
1193 points (98.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5934 readers
2605 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 241 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's such an alien thought process that I don't even know where I would begin with discussing politics with such a person.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 159 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is the voter Kamala was supposed to sway with “better messaging”.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 106 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

No, this is the voter she pissed off Dem voters for...

It didn't work out well if you've already forgotten.

If someone says trump is Hitler but they voted for him anyways...

Then he was already going to vote for trump, and chasing his vote just led to losing traditional Dem voters with literally no gain.

Moving to the right is political suicide, yet we keep doing it because that's how you max donations. And that's all the people running the party care about.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 48 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No, this is the voter she pissed off Dem voters for…

Not sure why you said "no", since you're making the same point I was. This is who the party asked her to sway, and now the party is blaming her for not working hard enough to win the votes of complete fucking morons.

I could have told you that ignoring these morons and running a campaign focused on the working class, social justice, and economic fairness would have gone 1000% farther than trying to win over fence-sitters during the most divided election in U.S. history. Not sure why the Democrats ignored this, I assume they have at least one competent advisor that said this...

[–] hobovision@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago

I think I interpreted it the same way the original commenter did, but I see now we're all on the same page.

Maybe instead of saying she was "supposed to" it would be more clear you meant her campaign was "trying to".

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 6 points 3 weeks ago

They said “no” because to them, the most important thing is blaming Kamala for whatever happened in some way. They’re disagreeing with you because you didn’t do that, and trying to correct you on it.

You blamed the voter, which was the right response. I would expand that to include blaming the obviously Russian-influenced campiagn, however it happened, that convinced this person that Ukraine was a hugely important issue in this campaign in this particular bizarre way.

We can give some blame to Kamala for her messaging, sure. But the thing you didn’t do, that made them say “no,” was redirect the whole conversation into a conversation about how it’s all Kamala’s fault and nothing else.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well if the right are the only ones who constantly vote then yes they well change their views. Doesn’t matter if 2/3 of the country are Democrats if they can’t be bothered to get off their asses and vote.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the people running the party didn’t see that they lost the left wing vote, they only care about who voted and not for them.

[–] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

ok but... the Democrats in swing states (hell, any state) who said "I'm staying home because Kamala courts Republicans, even though I know Trump is Hitler" are absolutely as shitty as the people who voted for Trump

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

So?

What matters is winning elections.

Stomping our feet and saying they should do what we tell them isn't fucking working.

So if you want them to vote D so together we can stop Rs...

Maybe we should try running a better candidate than we have been?

Maybe no matter how much the wealthy insist on it, just being slightly better than trump isn't enough.

Maybe we should just run the best candidate we can, one that already agrees with Dem voters so we don't have to ask millions of people to hold their nose?

The excuse for running candidates further to the right then Dem voters has always been that it would magically win an election.

It hasn't, and it won't.

It's a bad strategy and we've stuck with it for about a decade longer than we should have already.

What logical reason can you give to stick with a plan that even when it works doesn't get us as much as we need, and fails regularly?

As a bonus, the more Dems move right, the more Republicans do.

So every election Dem voters have their potential winnings reduced and potential loses increased...

And people are really surprised why turnout was low?!

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago

You mean by hanging out with Liz Cheney and talking about a 'lethal military'?