this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
142 points (98.6% liked)

chat

8197 readers
189 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But also Trump won because the "evil, stupid uncivilized masses" are all right-wing transphobes so the Dems have to be more right-wing next erection to sway voters?!

Am I getting this correct?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

need to re-run this analysis in swing states only for it to be convincing to libs

Death to America

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's been done and stein votes are nowhere close to Kamala. So instead, people have started accusing leftists of voting Trump directly because a few people did vote for both people like AOC and Trump... Generally low information voters with no concrete principles - just vibes about liking "outsiders", regardless of whether a supposed silver-spoon billionaire could ever even remotely consider an outside.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So instead, people have started accusing leftists of voting Trump directly because a few people did vote for both people like AOC and Trump

Dems: We need to dump our entire GOTV strategy into swing voters that will vote for either democrats or republicans.

Also Dems: Those swing voters splitting their ticket are pure evil.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 20 points 2 days ago

"They're pure evil and we need their votes" is a certified Dem classic

[–] miz@hexbear.net 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

haven't seen this re-done with final numbers

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In Michigan Harris lost by 80K votes (netting 70K fewer votes than Biden in 2020), anti-genocide candidates got 50K (37K more than 2020)

In Wisconsin Harris lost by 29K votes (netting 30K more votes than Biden in 2020), anti-genocide candidates got 17K (16K more than in 2020)

In Pennsylvania Harris lost by 130K votes (netting 66K fewer than Biden in 2020), anti-genocide candidates got 34K (Greens were not on the ballot in 2020)

In North Carolina Harris lost by 190K votes (netting 4K more than Biden in 2020), anti-genocide candidates got 35K votes (23K more than 2020)

I'm not a statician by any means but my reading of the numbers is that Michigan seems to be the only of these states that you could argue that abstentions from 2020 plus the growth of anti-genocide parties could have actually cost Harris the state.

Edit: if every single voter in these states that the Dems lost between 2020 and 2024 voted for Harris, and every vote for anti-genocide candidates was a whole seperate vote for Harris (which is an absurd assumption), then the only one of these states that would flip to her would be Michigan. If Palestine was what drove all of these votes away from Harris (also an absurd assumption) then we can fairly conclusively say that the Democrats' position on Palestine did not cost them WI, PA, and NC.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If they didn't vote in 2020 then yes they are not included in these numbers because they're unlikely to be Democrats that got pushed away from the party because of events in Palestine. Those voters that voted for Biden in 2020 and abstained voting this time around are included in these numbers however.

In two of these states Harris actually got more votes than Biden did four years ago. The gain in North Carolina is small enough that maybe it could be explained by changes in population or demographics and if adjusted for that she would have received fewer votes than Biden in 2020. Otherwise it seems fairly safe to say for all of these states except maybe Michigan that recent events in Palestine did not drive voters away from the Democrats between 2020 and 2024 because the Democrat's losses from 2020 and third party voters don't amount to more than Trump's margin of victory.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your argument hinges on people giving a fuck about the green party and PSL. I’m sorry, but the average person who has to commit to do elecotralism and stand in line for over 4 hours on a workday, they’re not voting for someone who has no chance of winning

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wasn't arguing a position, just pointing out that Michigan is really the only one of those states from the graphic that the numbers might suggest the possibility of Gaza playing a role in changing the outcome of the state election. I personally don't think it changed the outcome anywhere.

[–] buh@hexbear.net 17 points 2 days ago

In arizona Kamabla lost by almost 200k, with all 3rd party votes (including libertarian) at around 35k