this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
660 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

5433 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 60 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

America was built on the ideas of freedom and equality by slave owners who didn't think women should be allowed to vote.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Not exactly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_Compromise

Most places wanted no slavery.

The original tryanny of the minority was the planation owners that would not join beyond the Articles of Confederation unless they could continue with the slavery.

Women were still held down as they had been hisrorically, damn near everywhere. Not realy unique here.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 16 hours ago

I mean, they did give an earnest try at preventing a king from happening, and it did work for a couple hundred years.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Don’t forget they were also terrified of democracy. The Senate is one of the most comically anti-democratic institutions ever concocted. Wyoming has as much power as California. I mean it beggars belief that anyone but a complete imbecile could agree to something like that.

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's not democratic from a person level, but it is more democratic from a state level. At the time they hadn't quite figured out if they wanted to be a country or a collection of states that sometimes work together.

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Democracy is a system of government whose power is vested by the people (“demos”). Notice that the Senate does not legislate on behalf of people. Instead, it represents the interests of random land masses (clusters of zip codes). It is as stupid as it sounds and the exact opposite of democracy.

One of the main arguments by Senate proponents during the US founding was that democracy was unacceptable. “Government by the people for the people? What gives these people the right…” etcetera. If you want quotes I’ll dig them up, but that’s the vibe.

“Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either. […]

No. In fact, two democracies have never gone to war with each other. Why would they?

Democracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes, and no man's life or property will be secure." - John Adams (1807)

Ah, redistribution of wealth and moral progress, terrifying. In case it’s not obvious from these pathetic quotes, John Adams was a moron.

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Guess I should have said, it's not democratic it's Republican. And the question being what should legislature represent. I'm curious how the EU works as a governing body, is there proportional representation? Or does each county get an equal vote. Sorry for my ignorance.

Also yeah John Adams is a bit of a baffoon there.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The first two political parties were formed around that very debate.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Too bad Jefferson didn't rap.

Just had that fever.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The founding fathers were correct. A pure democracy is also known as mob rule. Anytime you can get 51% to agree with you, you can do whatever you like.

If 51% vote to take the homes of black people, that's decided and done.

Which is why modern democracies are all some form of representative democracy. Which in theory is supposed to act as a sort of check and balance on the system.

[–] Charapaso@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

I'm not following your argument, though I am slightly drunk. The disproportionate representation that's the focus of the post means that less than 51% of the populace could wield the levers of power in the Senate. That's minority rule, which is even worse than mob rule.

I get that mob rule is bad, and that we need checks in place to curb the possibility of abuses of power, but I see that as necessitating laws for super majorities and ranked choice or other ways of ensuring less extreme representatives getting into power.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 13 hours ago

But they got it started and we changed some things. We just didn't change enough, or perhaps changed the wrong things.