this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
142 points (100.0% liked)

sino

8159 readers
91 users here now

This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

  2. Imperialism will result in a ban.

  3. Sinophobic content will be removed.


Newcomer Welcome Wiki


FAQ:


China Guides:


Multimedia:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually the other way around. China has a monopoly on a number of rare earth metals essential for stuff like semiconductors and batteries.

[–] context@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

for rare earth's that's true, but there's a quartz mine in north carolina that's a source for ultra pure silicon

https://www.wired.com/story/book-excerpt-science-of-ultra-pure-silicon/

i'm not sure offhand how difficult that would be to replace by refining less pure sources of silicon

[–] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But that brings us to an equally important question: let’s say Spruce Pine is down for a while. How long until alternative sources of high purity quartz are located and brought online?

After all, as I wrote in the book, it’s not as if there’s no high purity quartz elsewhere. It’s more that Spruce Pine has a near unique combination of purity, availability and price. There are mines in Russia and Brazil, not to mention China, which already produce lots of high purity quartz. There are some companies which are able to make high purity quartz synthetically.

Per here: https://edconway.substack.com/p/whats-happening-at-spruce-pine

So difficult but not impossible or anything, China could manage just fine.

[–] context@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

thanks, that makes sense