Slop.

Our current federal government is a construct of the Roosevelt New Deal era. And as the country grew, so did the government. But our country has done more than just grow over the last 100 years — it has also evolved, from an agrarian to an industrial to a technology and information economy. Critically, the government never changed with it.

So the fundamental structure of the federal government hasn’t changed since at least 1924, but also the current structure of the federal governments is the result of the New Deal which started in 1933. Math!

He’s missing two important aspects of bureaucratic reform. One, simply observing redundancies/overlaps/byzantine jurisdictions isn’t the same thing as creating a streamlined replacement. To make sure everything still works at least as well as it did before requires deep diving into the structure and a careful balancing game in the re-organization. And, surprise surprise, that process often reveals that, once you get past the generalized critiques, there actually are good reasons why seemingly similar functions on the surface need to be divvied up between different agencies, especially when there are conflict of interest issues.

Second, these “reforms” typically end up being a shuffling of the bureaucratic deck rather than actually streamlining anything. Great, you moved a function from the Army Corps of Engineers to DOT, but if it’s the same bureaucratic approval processes and checkboxes, there’s no efficiency gained. And often the shuffling just creates confusion in the bureaucracy as to where the responsible party is now which just makes things less efficient, not more.