this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
1044 points (95.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12753 readers
3544 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

That's exactly my point.

It gets thrown around like any flavour of the year amongst American blues, but I am starting to realise most people have no idea what a paradox fundamentally is. Rather they think it's some sort of guiding idea because everyone keeps saying it and something about a philosopher—the entire premise whooshing over the heads of whichever tribalists "gotcha bombs" it entirely out of context.

Two comments of it here and I imagine at least one of you have never comprehended what it is and where they fit into it. Someone's the chicken; someone's the egg. A true idiot thinks they know the solution to that.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Where's the part you think we are getting wrong in the below?

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 12 points 14 hours ago

Reminder: there is no such thing as the paradox of tolerance.

The rules of tolerance only applies to the people who abide by it.

Therefore, you are tolerant of tolerant people if you abide by the rules of tolerance. You are intolerant of intolerant people if you abide by the rules of tolerance.

It is very straightforward, the only pathway to paradox is from a lack of lexical understanding of the rules of tolerance.