this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
-34 points (31.9% liked)

Political Memes

5608 readers
1308 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And remember, this is the same magazine that once had Hitler as person of the year. Mistakes do happen.

[–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not a mistake. The person of the year is not by definition a good person, but someone who's had a lot of influence during the year, for better or for worse.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago
[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's okay if you don't know what it means to make time's person of the year.

Just don't pretend like that level of nuance is something you do grasp.

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You have to admit the title “Person of the Year” does carry with it a certain gravitas, just by virtue of the way those words are used in every other instance. Game of the Year, Movie of the Year, etc are all superlatives - regardless of whether they can hide behind the plausible deniability of their own definition.

They have nothing to lose by not putting a criminal oligarch on the front cover. Bet it made Time a lot of money though so, ya know, that’s what matters.

This similar to how Rogan justifies platforming Nazis and conspiracy nuts. And anyway, it’s not really even “news”; it’s just a long opinion piece with facts sprinkled in.