this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
233 readers
443 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly, I don't hate it. I hate the guy that said it, but the meaning is clear enough and sticks to common rules for making up words in english.
It's about as valid as "hypersonic missiles" which are just supersonic missiles with extra steps.
If x^2 is exponential, x^200 is still exponential, but with a more extreme curve
Math fun fact time:
Neither x^2 and x^200 are exponential growth, they are polynomial growth. 2^x or 200^x would be exponential growth. After a certain point, all exponential curves will outpace any polynomial curve.
So after a certain x, 2^x will outpace even x^200. This happens at around x=2224, after which 2^x will always be bigger than x^200.
If you know the rules for indices and logarithms, you can see why this is. We can take the logarithm of both functions which converts them both into slower forms that we can understand easily.
log(2^x) simplifies to x log(2), which grows linearly. However, log(x^200) simplifies to 200 log(x), which grows according to log(x), a painfully slow growing function that quickly grinds to a near halt.