this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
522 points (82.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9786 readers
983 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 166 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This is incredibly reductive and makes us look like idiots who don't understand "intent".

I get it, fuck cars, but this is ridiculous and only serves to make us look like a joke

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Then there's the Sacklers pushing everyone on opioids until the US public is addicted and getting fentanyl off the street. 82,000 deaths in 2022. The trend is that number is rising.

Was it intentional that Purdue started the epidemic? Their lobbyists pushed doctors to over prescribe them including for instances that didn't warrant them, including material bonuses. So not really, but their shareholders really like dividends even if people have to die for them.

Was it legal? Well, it hasn't been made illegal yet

See, were not looking at the true evil.

In the case of cars, its not really the driver, but in the US, the stanglehold on transit held by big automotive and big fossil fuel. We have lots of highways (the Interstate Highway System is the biggest single project in the world) and they keep killing high speed trains and begrudge municipal transit, and parking requirements assure that every city is a sprawl of delineated asphalt.

There's the evil. And since its propelling the climate crisis (and we're running out of water) it is going to kill us all.

Too bad they threw billions at the far-right propaganda machine to push the fascist autocrat over the non-white non-male that wanted to transition to renewables.

Guns are pushed in the US, and kept fairly unregulated by the munitions companies. Their ads imply you can't be a real man without a loaded firearm. I never got it, but everyone male on the far-right is super sensitive about their masculinity. And they really like guns.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

🙌PREACH🙌

These are the types of arguments we ought to be making memes about. Well reasoned, well spoken, and based in facts that are irrefutable

Kudos. Thank you for doing "fuck cars" the right way 💪❤️

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Oops, my foot slipped on the wrong pedal."

Intent without confessions and manifestos may not be that easy to prove.

[–] FrostyCaribou@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Recklessness generally also works in place of intentionally. Negligence is even lower, but is often reserved for civil suits.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

They're not comparable.

If I'm at a firing range, where it is expected that people are carrying guns and ammunition, I can pull the same "oops, my finger slipped" excuse.

Similarly, if I drive my car around the side of your house and into your back yard to run you over, I can't claim "my foot slipped".

Seriously, stop with the mental gymnastics. We don't need to reach for more reasons to say "fuck cars." There are plenty within arms reach

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Similarly, if I drive my car around the side of your house and into your back yard to run you over, I can’t claim “my foot slipped”.

I see one of those posts with cars crashed into houses every week somewhere. No murder charge.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Perhaps that's because... There usually aren't fatalities inside the home???

Like, not only is it a giant, loud object that can be seen coming in many cases, but the impact with the house exterior dissipates a huge portion of the energy.

When people get killed my a car, they don't die from the car hitting them. It's almost always the impact with the ground that causes severe head trauma. Otherwise it's a neck or spinal injury.

Those types of injuries are just way, way less likely to happen when a car drives into a building.

I'm getting really sick of people around here not showing even a modicum of logical thought and just screeching "CaRs BaD!!" every other sentence.

Fuck cars, for a lot of reasons. We don't need to make up new ones that are silly and illogical. We have plenty of really good reasons to say fuck cars that don't involve bullshit claims re: murder charges or a lack thereof

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 26 minutes ago

Hey, remember that story a while back about the rich kid that "accidentally" ran his truck through a pack of cyclists trying to roll coal on them? What ended up happening to him? (To be fair, nobody died, but still, 6 people seriously injured, at least a couple of those were life changing injuries, you'd think that would be comparable severity...)

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, we shouldn't build our cities around hundreds miles of firing ranges then, right?

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

See, THAT is a reasonable, thoughtful argument. Yes, the density of cars in our cities is dangerous.

But there is not some epidemic of vehicular murders going unpunished.

Rather, we have normalized living in a high risk environment. And THAT is the crux of the problem. Not law enforcement

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago

You are the one doing mental gymnastics bro. What is that back yard comparison? Obviously you just swerve off the road, run him over and say you fell asleep - long day, had to work long hours to pay off my medical debt. Or have an old person run over CEOs, 80yo in cars kill people all the time because they should not be driving anymore. They always get off easy.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

That’s exactly what it’s doing.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure that kid in Texas totally didn't have intent when he ran over 12 people then backed up over them again

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And did that kid get off with a "oopsies!"? No? Then how is that related to this thread?

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

If we are talking about the rolling coal kid, he did get off with an oopsie.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Would love to see a citation on this. Not familiar with the specifics and would love to know more but I had trouble finding this specific story

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

https://archive.ph/3tLtL#selection-1499.0-1499.550

More than a year passed with no news about the crash or charges against the driver. Then, in the winter of 2022, the Waller County District Attorney quietly closed the case without a public announcement. Because the defendant had been handled as a juvenile, the court proceedings and final verdict were sealed. Had the case been dropped? Was there a settlement?

The boy would soon graduate from Waller High School, walking across a stage in front of a large crowd. The victims wondered what level of remorse he felt in the wake of the crash, and whether he might go on to impart some measure of good on the world?

“I don’t think they ever could prove it was intentional,” DeToto said, getting into the legal semantics of recklessness versus the desire to do harm. “I’m not defending rolling coal on anybody. But that’s probably not going to be a Class A assault where you could go to jail. It’s going to be a Class C. It’s just like a ticket. Is it offensive? Yes. But it’s a different level than intentionally hitting a group of bikers.”

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yuck. That's pretty distressing :( It sounds like the civil case is still ongoing? Maybe the parents will feel some burden (as guardians should in this case).

For what it's worth, just to clarify for anyone reading along with the context of this conversation:

  • nobody died in this incident, though multiple people suffered long term debilitating physical and psychological trauma
  • the perpetrator was a minor, and in an assault case where there was no clear intent to cause physical harm - the trend of "rolling coal" being one of intimidation and clout-chasing - the virtue of pursuing criminal convictions that would be expunged before any sentencing of substance could occur is questionable
  • as a minor, any plea agreement or settlement would be sealed. Not even the victims would be allowed to discuss it. So it's very possible it wasn't just an "oopsie" but a settlement where the kid lost his license, was placed under house arrest, was required to do community service, with the parents helping cover medical expenses.... We'd never know. Which is itself a problem, for sure, because it undermines the deterrent factor for others!
  • there is still an opportunity for civil remedies for the victims, and I'm confident their insurance providers will be trying to recoup their costs

What a shitty situation. Frankly, the law is just really poorly equipped to handle minors who engage in reckless endangerment with a vehicle. We badly need to get some better laws on the books for handling kids who show wonton disregard for others' safety, especially when it's just for clout

It seems like the prosecutor really did want to go hard on this case too. The article mentions a previous conviction against someone who actually did kill cyclists with their vehicle: life in prison

In 2017, an army veteran named Victor Tome had veered head-on into a group of people riding bikes in Waller County. The crash killed two riders. Tome, who’d been intoxicated on a mixture of drugs, received a life sentence without parole.

But to bring it back around to the OP: I think this kinda proves the point I was trying to make...nobody is getting away with murder. And I have a strong suspicion that if anyone had been killed, they'd have tried to prosecute the driver as an adult.

I need to go watch something happy after reading that article. What a horrible incident. Maybe the victims got justice and we won't ever know, and it certainly seems like the city/county made some significant changes in the aftermath. But it still doesn't feel right. :(