this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
499 points (81.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9786 readers
1121 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 3 minutes ago)

It could be hard to explain why he had to drive it up on the sidewalk and squeeze between the curb-parked cars and the building on accident. And also why it was covered in silencers.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago

My friend's mom got run over recently. The guy had the alcohol percentage that indicated he'd don't at least ten shots of hard liquor in an hour and he was going well over the speed limit. He got her so hard it crumpled the front of his truck.

But in Cali, since it's a first time offence, he's getting like, a thousand dollar fine. The cremation is going to cost more.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Does this work for car bombs? Asking for a friend

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 26 points 10 hours ago

Innocent until proven guilty.

Luigi didn't kill that CEO as far as we know, and titles like this don't help an innocent man.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 29 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If he used a car purposefully to kill the CEO, no- he would most certainly NOT be free right now.

Murder is murder, regardless of the chosen method.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 33 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

He would obviously just lie and say it was an accident. I would match his story.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (6 children)

That’s not how vehicular manslaughter trials work. It’s like any other murder prosecution. He’d need to prove it was an accident. And mowing down someone with a car in front of witnesses in broad daylight?

Yeah…

Guilty.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

no he doesn't need to prove it, in a criminal trial in most countries, the prosecution has the burden of proof; in the US "beyond a reasonable doubt"

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

According to legal advice:

To prove a car accident was not intentional in court, you would need to present evidence demonstrating that your actions at the time of the crash were not deliberate, including factors like: witness testimonies, police reports, vehicle damage analysis, your driving record, medical records, and expert testimony to explain the circumstances leading to the accident, highlighting any distractions, mechanical failures, or unexpected road conditions that could have contributed to the crash.

Either way, he didn’t accidentally shoot an unarmed man in the back… so this entire whatabout is irrelevant.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 28 minutes ago) (1 children)

What context was this legal advice given in? This may be advice for a civil lawsuit too?

In any case it is of course true that it is good to be able to present evidence in one's favor in criminal court, but that is to establish that there is reasonable doubt, not because the defendant has the burden of proof.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

It’s irrelevant. We’re not talking about an accident. We’re talking about an intent to kill. He had a manifesto, there are witnesses… He murdered a man.

If it were a gun or a car. It’s irrelevant.

I’m not getting trapped up in semantics.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 minutes ago

And I wasn't talking about this or any other specific case, just attempting to make sure that people understood the general legal concepts.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 13 hours ago (6 children)
[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 hours ago

It was 6:44am, and the sun rose at 7:08 am, so yes.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 164 points 1 day ago (24 children)

This is incredibly reductive and makes us look like idiots who don't understand "intent".

I get it, fuck cars, but this is ridiculous and only serves to make us look like a joke

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Then there's the Sacklers pushing everyone on opioids until the US public is addicted and getting fentanyl off the street. 82,000 deaths in 2022. The trend is that number is rising.

Was it intentional that Purdue started the epidemic? Their lobbyists pushed doctors to over prescribe them including for instances that didn't warrant them, including material bonuses. So not really, but their shareholders really like dividends even if people have to die for them.

Was it legal? Well, it hasn't been made illegal yet

See, were not looking at the true evil.

In the case of cars, its not really the driver, but in the US, the stanglehold on transit held by big automotive and big fossil fuel. We have lots of highways (the Interstate Highway System is the biggest single project in the world) and they keep killing high speed trains and begrudge municipal transit, and parking requirements assure that every city is a sprawl of delineated asphalt.

There's the evil. And since its propelling the climate crisis (and we're running out of water) it is going to kill us all.

Too bad they threw billions at the far-right propaganda machine to push the fascist autocrat over the non-white non-male that wanted to transition to renewables.

Guns are pushed in the US, and kept fairly unregulated by the munitions companies. Their ads imply you can't be a real man without a loaded firearm. I never got it, but everyone male on the far-right is super sensitive about their masculinity. And they really like guns.

[–] neatchee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

🙌PREACH🙌

These are the types of arguments we ought to be making memes about. Well reasoned, well spoken, and based in facts that are irrefutable

Kudos. Thank you for doing "fuck cars" the right way 💪❤️

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

That’s exactly what it’s doing.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›