this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
203 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22342 readers
143 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm gonna go with both

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip 84 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1970

We're in danger of producing an educated prolitariat. That's dynamite! We have to be selective on who we allow to go through (higher education)

  • Roger Freeman, professor of economics and advisor to President Reagan

Denial of education will leave many perceiving violence as the only practical means of change.

The ghoul does have a point. Educating the proletariat is not a precondition for revolution, but a literate, and educated proletariat does make radicalization easier.

Hence why Russia, China, Cuba, All the successful socialist revolutions started educating people, and boosting literacy rates, as soon as they got into power.

When you grant people access to education, which has typically served as a gateway, as a way to deny social advancement; and then people don't socially advance, they start to question the rest of the system. In my opinion, this is one reason that your average 20-year-old is far more skeptical of the capitalist regime, then your average 60-year-old. One grew up in an America where was possible to advance after gaining a highly subsidized education, the other went into extreme debt for an education that gives them nothing.