this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
355 points (86.3% liked)

politics

19254 readers
2335 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This new bill, signed into law by President Joe Biden, includes a provision that limits access to gender-affirming care services for the children of people serving in the military.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 80 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck off Joe. Stop doing Trump's dirty work for him.

Pocket veto that shit.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This whole thread is fucking disappointing. Yes it's super shitty that tricare isn't going to cover trans kids. We just had a budget showdown where Elon fucking Musk tried to tank the entire nation. Biden signed this shit and said he hated that he had to do it because it excluded trans kids.

I'm no Biden fan but holy shit get your course corrected and get ready friends because this ain't shit compared to what's to come.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. The political ignorance of the common American is why it is so easy able to drive these wedges.

Anyone pissed at Biden about this is not a politically smart person and are easily manipulated becuase they not only lack political intelligence but lack the ability to gauge their lack of political intelligence.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They could have just not funded the government/military, I would be fine with that.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Yea they could have. But Biden didn’t shut down paychecks for regular folks right at christmas…

You’d be fine with that.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Biden had ample opportunity to end these budget hostage sessions, but he rejected them all.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

When did Biden control legislation? Did I miss him giving multiple vetoes to previous bills? The hell does this have to do with him and not every republican screwing up congress?

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If the DNC had chosen to run progressive policies we wouldnt be here. But they didnt and here we are.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

They should have. Obama running on “change” should have clued them into something. But still, Biden didn’t elect this congress, nor write this bill, nor did he cause this mess we’re in. It’s fair to say dems didn’t swing hard enough, but the GOP has an unrelenting presence, propelling the problem and yet getting votes. Thats on Fox News not Biden.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Better than picking disposable section of society to throw under the bus in the name of compromise, why do Trump's work for him?

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

THAT IS picking disposable sections of society to throw under the bus. What are you taking about?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"we just had to do whatever Trump wanted otherwise 'regular folk' might get affected slightly"

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

You know, the "regular folks", the military members without trans children. Not the weirdos who also serve but have kids who are trans. It would be really tragic if the regular folks were inconvenienced.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yea do what trump wanted… like defunding the gov. What are you talking about?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

defunding the US military would be a great thing tbh

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a lot more to the US government than just the military.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm aware, but it's still not vanishing overnight. We have had plenty of shutdowns in the past and this shit wasn't urgent.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Being smart about federal funding would be great. Your BS would be stupid.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean if the government shut down the US military doesn't vanish, we've had many shutdowns in the past, this shit wasn't urgent.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

True. BUT… that doesn’t mean hurt doesn’t hurt.

It’s not a group that deserves sacrifice…

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not like those active duty servicemembers with trans kids. They're a group that deserves to sacrifice, and in major ways that go beyond a delayed paycheck.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Biden. Didn’t. Write. The. Bill.

I agree with you, but let’s take this as far as it goes. Biden vetoes and then what?

The Republicans in congress suddenly change? Where’s the reality other than “Biden refuses to sign, no one gets paid this Christmas”. Veto power is strategic not really a blunt tool.

This isn’t a Biden thing it’s on the GOP and the voters that put them there. Congress wrote the fucking bill why is that Biden’s fault?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's amazing how you frame Biden's surrender as necessary and not the GOP's. They're responsible for the bill, but despite every other shutdown being blamed on them, would just then refuse to fund the troops they claim they love so much. You've so internalized "they're crazy, they'll do anything", which isn't actually how any of these confrontations play out, that you think the only reasonable solution is "just give them what they want".

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So it’s amazing how I understand the three branches…. How they work and how specifically they are breaking down…

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, they did deny lifesaving care to trans kids, and you support this bill for that reason alone.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s a fuck ton to read into someone just saying we should pay people… but the trans BUT THE TRANS! No one is disagreeing with you but yourself. Well also the GOP… SO WHAT ABOUT THE TRANS!!!!

I mean for fucks sake we just had Elon Musk wave his dick around and influence this legislation and this whole thread is blaming Biden… some smooth brain shit going on here.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The only thing it's denying is surgery that could cause sterilization. A thing that is pretty rare for children to undergo.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

HRT can cause sterilization. It's very safe, but it can. The UK conservatives just banned puberty blockers on the claim that it could cause sterilization. There's nothing reasonable about this innocuous line. It's a carte blanche to stop all coverage.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is that ever performed on minors for gender reassignment reasons anyway? It seems like a weird thing to ban. What's next, are they going to make it illegal to perform GRS on dead people?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is, but it's not common. There's a metric fuck ton of hurdles that have to be jumped through, so it's basically just a dog whistle used to justify banning any gender affirming care.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, so same playbook as abortion with those scary 'late stage abortions' that are basically exclusively done to rescue people from dangerous and nonviable pregnancies.