150
Two of these women are famous chess streamers/content creators and at least one is a women’s chess master
(hexbear.net)
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
150 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
289 readers
550 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In a just world rtm135 would be forced to play a shadow game in which he must beat every single one of these women at Chess or be banished to the Shadow Realm
same energy:
When I first came upon this question years ago, I was like "A game of tennis goes for like 3 hours, surely I could get a singular point in that time, if she faults"
Then I was informed "winning a point" means winning a set, so I revised my answer to "Yeah absolutely not".
Maybe some of that 12% had the same thought process I did, but even then that's a ridiculously high number
Winning a point does just mean a single service, and it's still true. Tennis pros only fault because they're playing on the bleeding edge of their game to beat their peers. Serena Williams can play at 50% of her capability against you, never come close to a fault, and wrap up the match in 30 mins.
Horrible taste in men though.
I guess relying on your opponent to fuck up isn't a reliable strategy unless your opponent is the US government.