this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
160 points (97.1% liked)

Fediverse

28850 readers
806 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

jointhefediverse.net seems to be a commonly linked resource for directing people to join the Fediverse.

Curiously, it does not list Lemmy under the list of Reddit alternatives. Their GitHub README explains why.

Previous relevant discussion: https://lemmy.ml/post/78808

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 72 points 16 hours ago (10 children)

Lemmy was removed due to:

  • reports of how the developers handle certain types of content (post removed, view an incomplete archive)
  • the behavior of its creator
  • how the sotware itself handles users' privacy.

All valid concerns.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago

No, they're not.

how the developers handle certain types of content

Doesn't matter if you stay away from .ml.

the behavior of its creator

Kind of valid, but open source and open license negates a lot of that.

how the sotware itself handles users’ privacy.

You think anything else on the Fediverse is better? When you post something publicly, it's public. Doesn't really matter what the software does. If you don't have End to End encryption, it's not private.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 hours ago

The linked post given on the second point is a bit flimsy. It's basically saying that if you use evidence published by a person with shitty views, you must have them too. To me, that's absurd as claiming that referencing FBI statistics makes someone a federal agent.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

deleted by creator

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 44 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Point 1 and 2 really need to be addressed.

It would be so much better if lemmy wasn't developed by genocide white-washing tankies.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 15 points 15 hours ago (4 children)
[–] kat@orbi.camp 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Any way to migrate a self hosted lemmy instance to piefed?

[–] andrew_s@piefed.social 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's not geared up for that. There's a platform called sublinks where the intention is to be initially compatible enough with Lemmy that it can be a drop-in replacement, but they haven't released anything yet.

[–] kat@orbi.camp 2 points 11 hours ago

Oh interesting, thanks for sharing!

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 2 points 9 hours ago

just run both!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 30 points 15 hours ago (15 children)

To me the first one is an instance problem (ml, hexbear?), and not a lemmy problem. It has looked like they've been trying to separate the two as much as possible.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But the Lemmy project and specific instances are not so easily separated. From the archived mastodon thread:

lemmy.ml (the official Lemmy instance) resolves to the same IP address as lemmygrad.ml (the instance that contains the most disturbing material).

Lemmy.ml also federates with lemmygrad, and the devs advertise lemmygrad on their "join lemmy" site.

Do the Lemmy developers themselves run the lemmygrad.ml site? (Its main logo is a tank, incidentally.)

So yeah, newcomers are presented with a join-lemmy site that promotes Lemmygrad and Lemmy ML, both of which appear to be run by the Lemmy devs.

That pretty much makes it a Lemmy problem.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 4 hours ago

On what basis can anyone declare one instance to be the 'main' one? I've seen a number of people claim the same thing about .world, but none of them need to be considered the 'main' ones. The entire motivation for the creation of the fediverse is to allow segmentation.... I think people simply want to make it an issue because without these little cross-community spats things get boring.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is why I'm looking forward to Sublinks launching.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Piefed is more promosing. Sublinks has been on hold for a while now

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 19 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

What is the issue with user privacy? These do not sound like valid concerns to me.

[–] andrew_s@piefed.social 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is all quite old drama, and the issue itself is fixed now, but at one point someone kicked off about how if you uploaded a picture to Lemmy, there was no easy way to delete it (you could delete your post, but the image would still be there at whatever URL was created for it, and it wasn't even that easy for admins to find and remove it) - so I'm guessing that it stems from that.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Its older than that, and still ongoing. The devs doubled down on how GDPR (and user data privacy rights in general) do not matter to them

[–] teohhanhui@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Source? I did a cursory search for "GDPR" on the GitHub issues and can't find anything like that.

Anyway, this seems to be their more recent stance:

For the future, any GDPR compliance advice needs to come from a lawyer, not from random non-lawyers interpreting what they think is correct.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4540#issuecomment-2018920191

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

That's pretty much it

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Wait, what? Can you elaborate?

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

See the other comment

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

it's federated. It's the only way it can work. Everything still on that ist must suffer from the same thing. Federation means handing stuff to someone else. Once that's done, it's out of your hands forever.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 14 hours ago

Once that's done, it's out of your hands forever.

Correct but fedi is supposed to be the public forum of the future.

Social media worked the same... you handed your shit posts to faceberg or sundar the creep, do people think when they deleted their "creation" it was removed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teohhanhui@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, seems like it's just how ActivityPub works / how federated networks are.

Recently came across this very interesting writeup: https://gitlab.com/spritely/ocappub/blob/master/README.org (via https://social.coop/@cwebber/113639985634239856)

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 13 hours ago

No that cant be why they do not list lemmy. The other services there federate in the same way.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

These concerns, and more, are why just today, during a conversation with some friends looking to get off traditional social media, I advised them to join pixelfed, peer tube, mastodon, and loops, but suggested they strictly avoid Lemmy.

The communities aren’t right for anyone who isn’t seeking something exactly like Lemmy or leftie-Reddit-lite. I don’t even really like it here all that much anymore. Not the content; the interactions… across all my accounts.. even joining “nicer” spaces is not a particularly nice or pleasant experience, plus the more interested is a woman, and Lemmy is a horrible sausagefest echo chamber not at all suited to a normal average woman person who isn’t techie. I’m techie, so I’m used to the vibe, but for your average cis-woman, Lemmy is a very very bad fit.

Bring on the downvotes if you like (the echo-chamber anti-voice sentiment is part of why people shouldn’t be recommended this platform, after all) but these are legit concerns for people who may want to join, and those of us already here can and do steer people elsewhere as a result.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Fair points, to be honest. We can all do better.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 5 points 4 hours ago

Lemmy is a horrible sausagefest echo chamber not at all suited to a normal average woman person who isn’t techie.

Far be it from me to point out this is exactly how reddit started.

The foundational promise of lemmy and the fediverse writ large is freedom from proprietary software and closed-protocols; the kind of people who are going to be interested in seeking out those types of alternatives are going to gravitate toward techy men.

It takes time for new social media sites to fan outward from their initial adopters, that's just how it goes.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Same honestly. I never discussed politics on Reddit, but it's all the content that's here. Partly why I don't recommend it to anyone i know who uses Reddit. Most content just isn't normie-friendly here.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 hours ago

It’s so depressing and aggressive, honestly. I can’t do that to my friends who don’t do that already.

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

First link is completely unviewable for me on mobile, the entire thread is a chain of posts that say “Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression” with a show more button that doesn’t work, and the original thread is gone. Could you(/someone) paste what it says? I’d try on desktop but our internet has been out since the fires started in LA

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Entire thread, all from the same user:

Post 1Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

Human rights mean a lot to me. I joined the Fediverse to make the world a nicer place. My efforts are pathetically small, but hopefully make at least a tiny difference.

I used to recommend Lemmy very strongly, thought the people who develop it were nice folks interested in making the world better too.

However, recent discussions with the developers has changed my mind completely.

I am very suspicious about their motivations now.

1/6

Post 2Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

Lemmy's developers say "we are strictly against all forms of oppression (including genocide), and dont allow anything that promotes or supports oppression" and "We definitely are very staunchly against bigotry or persecution of minorities, and are strict about banning that".

This is difficult to fully reconcile with what actually happens on the developers' own instance, and those they feature.

2/6

Post 3Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

The problem here isn't Lemmy's politics, but their attitude to threads about human rights violations.

On the face of it, the developers' main Lemmy instance has lots of uncontroversial general interest threads, but when you start digging on controversial topics a worrying pattern emerges.

The worrying posts are very reminiscent of the way certain churches have handled priest abuse claims: denial.

3/6

Post 4Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

There's threads denyng the oppression of Uyghur muslims (this oppression has been well documented by NGOs, for example: https://www.amnesty.org.uk/actions/help-end-repression-uyghurs-china).

Other posts deny that North Korea is oppressive.

Meanwhile, another suggests celebrating Stalin's birthday as he was such a great guy.

(Incidentally, I have receipts, DM me if you want to see them for yourself.)

4/6

Post 5Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

You get the picture.

These posts were on the main Lemmy instance, as featured on the official Lemmy website.

Over the past few days I have tried to engage with Lemmy about these posts in private, as I was sure it must be a misunderstanding.

However, Lemmy said that "none of the posts you linked are against our rules", and refused to even discuss the actual issues because "this format is not conducive to political disagreements".

5/6

Post 6Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

I deeply regret ever having publicised Lemmy. I'm really sorry.

Don't use Lemmy.

For whatever my opinion is worth any more, I would now recommend that people cancel their donations to Lemmy, stay as far away from Lemmy as possible, and donate to another Fediverse project instead.

I was wondering whether to stay quiet, but it seemed better to speak up and say something

6/6

Post 7Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

p.s. I put the wrong link for Amnesty, the Uyghur report is here:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa17/4137/2021/ug/

Post 8Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

p.p.s. Someone has pointed out that lemmy.ml (the official Lemmy instance) resolves to the same IP address as lemmygrad.ml (the instance that contains the most disturbing material).

Lemmy.ml also federates with lemmygrad, and the devs advertise lemmygrad on their "join lemmy" site.

Do the Lemmy developers themselves run the lemmygrad.ml site? (Its main logo is a tank, incidentally.)

Post 9Please don't use Lemmy :( Human rights, oppression

p.p.p.s. There was an older "reddit for the Fediverse" project called Prismo which had some working instances at one point.

Perhaps someone could resurrect it, to provide an alternative to Lemmy?

https://gitlab.com/prismosuite/prismo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

since the fires started in LA

Sorry to hear

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 15 hours ago

Thanks, fortunately I’m not in any evacuation zones, it’s just really bad air quality here

load more comments (1 replies)