this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
117 points (98.3% liked)

Slop.

289 readers
472 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So argument is, playing “separate the art from artist” is functionally the same as dancing to music made by people you wouldn’t accept in your neighborhood? Rather than grapple with the contradictions, just pretend they don’t exist?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

maybe; you'll have to ask margaret cho to get that answer

[–] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol you brought it up! At least defend YOUR interpretation of the quote

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i made it clear; if there's a question for me, then you need to clarify since it's not clear from your response.

[–] Balefirex@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

they had two clear questions in their comment

So argument is, playing “separate the art from artist” is functionally the same as dancing to music made by people you wouldn’t accept in your neighborhood?

Rather than grapple with the contradictions, just pretend they don’t exist?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

IC. They sound rhetorical to me since they're both the same things I said