this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
63 points (100.0% liked)

History

23205 readers
126 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The phrase "crossing the Rubicon" is an idiom that means "passing a point of no return". Its meaning comes from allusion to the crossing of the river Rubicon from the north by Julius Caesar in early January 49 BC. The exact date is unknown. Scholars usually place it on the night of 10 and 11 January because of the speeds at which messengers could travel at that time. It is often asserted that Caesar's crossing of the river precipitated Caesar's civil war, but Caesar's forces had already crossed into Italy and occupied Ariminum the previous day.

Caesar's civil war (49–45 BC) was a civil war during the late Roman Republic between two factions led by Gaius Julius Caesar and Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (Pompey). The main cause of the war was political tensions relating to Caesar's place in the republic on his expected return to Rome on the expiration of his governorship in Gaul.

Before the war, Caesar had led an invasion of Gaul for almost ten years. A build-up of tensions starting in late 50 BC, with both Caesar and Pompey refusing to back down, led to the outbreak of civil war. Pompey and his allies induced the Senate to demand Caesar give up his provinces and armies in the opening days of 49 BC. Caesar refused and instead marched on Rome.

The war was fought in Italy, Illyria, Greece, Egypt, Africa, and Hispania. The decisive events occurred in Greece in 48 BC: Pompey defeated Caesar at the Battle of Dyrrhachium, but the subsequent larger Battle of Pharsalus was won by Caesar and Pompey's army disintegrated. Many prominent supporters of Pompey (termed Pompeians) surrendered after the battle, such as Marcus Junius Brutus and Cicero. Others fought on, including Cato the Younger and Metellus Scipio. Pompey fled to Egypt, where he was assassinated upon arrival.

Caesar led a military expedition to Asia Minor before attacking North Africa, where he defeated Metellus Scipio in 46 BC at the Battle of Thapsus. Cato and Metellus Scipio killed themselves shortly thereafter. The following year, Caesar defeated the last of the Pompeians, at the Battle of Munda in Spain, who were led by his former lieutenant Labienus. Caesar was then made dictator perpetuo ("dictator in perpetuity" or "dictator for life") by the Roman senate in 44 BC. He was assassinated by a group of senators (including Brutus) shortly thereafter.

The civil war is one of the commonly recognised endpoints of Rome's republican government. Some scholars view the war as the proximate cause of the republic's fall, due to its polarising interruption of normal republican government.[4] Caesar's comprehensive victory followed by his immediate death left a power vacuum; over the following years his heir Octavian was eventually able to take complete control, forming the Roman Empire as Augustus.

Hexbear links

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I've been watching some Law and Order: SVU reruns lately (don't ask me why, it's probably just my unquenchable thirst for garbage) and some of the writing has been even worse than the "funny bad" stuff I was expecting.

One case involved the murder of a an underage female transgender sex worker, and Mariska Hargitay's character says this incredible line when inspecting her body:

[CW: Transphobia]

spoiler

She's not a "she" ...not physically, anyway"

After the autopsy, they conclude the body "wasn't transgender" and proceed to refer to the victim as "he" and "the boy" for the entire rest of the episode. There could be some kind of in-text justification for the confusion about the victim's gender since it turns out she had been hired to pose as a reclusive author who turns out to be an elderly Jewish guy who lives in a dilapidated mansion with his brother and the frozen corpse of their mother writing semi-autobiographically about his experiences being molested as a small boy in the 1950s. Alternatively, the crusty old liberals who write for the show don't know what the fuck they're doing

In another episode, Mariska Hargitay's character tries to not-so-subtly push a pregnant SA victim to keep her abuser's child

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 8 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I saw a video the other day CW: discussion of extreme transphobia about a Law and Order: SVU episode in which

CW: TransphobiaA teenage trans girl accidentally kills a guy who was trying to SA her, so the SVU team gets her thrown in a male prison where she's immediately SA'd nearly to death

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I feel like all these cop shows where a "rare" bad cop does something horrible like a hatecrime are less about seeing a victim brought to justice in a fantasy land where cops are good, and more for the writers to salivate over a minority being tortured.

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

CW: Transphobic cop slop

spoiler

ADA Cabot initially gave a plea bargain for Cheryl, but she was sentenced to a prison for men. Cheryl refused to stop taking female hormones and didn't accept the offer of being placed in protective custody, so Alex took away her plea bargain. At the end of the trial, Cheryl was found guilty and sentenced to a prison for men at Riker's Island. It was reported later that she was gang-r***d at Riker's Island and rushed to a hospital. (SVU: "Fallacy")

Oh wow avgn-horror

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's incredibly, profoundly cursed

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

CW: More transphobia

spoilerProving that Cheryl is transgender, the detectives now believe that Eddie and Cheryl worked together to kill Joe to protect Cheryl's secret. In the interrogation room, Stabler tells Eddie that Cheryl is a man. Eddie is shocked and angry and demands to see Cheryl. He storms into the interrogation room where Cheryl is, calls her a freak and leaves, leaving Cheryl in tears. Benson tells Cheryl they thought Eddie knew and that he was protecting her. But Cheryl wanted to wait until after her sex change operation to tell him, hoping that he would love her enough and he wouldn't care. Cheryl finally tells the truth - Joe found out her secret and was going to tell Eddie. She knocked him out with the vase so he wouldn't talk but she insists she didn't mean to kill him. The scene cuts to Stabler in the men's room talking to Eddie, when Eddie suddenly collapses. Huang pronounces Eddie dead, saying he committed suicide by overdosing on his heart medication.

INCREDIBLE

Apparently it's a 2003 episode which probably explains why it's this off the rails. The show's still bad but not quite this bad

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that summary leave something important out of the scene

CW: even more transphobiaEddie also SA's Cheryl by grabbing her groin right in front of the SVU cops in that scene and the cops do nothing

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 3 points 13 hours ago

yikes

You can really feel that shit was written during Dubya's first term, jesus

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 16 hours ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

wait so they thought the victim was a woman, than a trans woman, then a guy?
what was the reasoning?

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

In the opening they first assumed the victim was a cis woman, then the main detective crouches next to her clothed body and immediately determines she's not "physically female."

Then we skip to after the autopsy and they ditch the possibility of the victim having been transgender due the body not having been transgender (???) and they just start referring to her as male.

There's a whole plot where a pseudonymous author has been writing about their experiences as an underage sex worker. A shady literary agent wants to sell the movie rights to the book which requires him to have someone pretend to be the author at an event, so he hires a transgender sex worker off the street for the job.

Due to the ruse, the cops initially believe the victim to be the author. However, the actual author is an elderly man who was sexually abused when he was 12 at a youth center and who draws upon those experiences for the book.

I guess his pseudonymous author persona was also a trans woman, because why else would've the agent picked a trans woman to pose as them? But the elderly guy was a cis male who was abused as a boy

It's just very confusing monke-beepboop

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

so did the author kill the person posing as them?
what does it mean that the body isn't transgender?

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

so did the author kill the person posing as them?

The victim was killed by one of her former johns for gay panic reasons. The killing ended up having nothing to do with the author switcheroo.

what does it mean that the body isn't transgender?

I have zero clue what the fuck Law & Order writers circa 2018 intended with that. Remember, at that point in the story the victim's real identity wasn't even known so I think they just had the cops assume their gender identity from a post mortem examination

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

do you remember what the episode was called?

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Looks like it was called "Alta Kockers." Let me know if I got something wrong, but I'm pretty sure how the victim's gender identity was handled was at the very least iffy

[–] LocalMaxima@hexbear.net 5 points 18 hours ago

Going to the surgeon to Alta my Kock

[–] Tomboymoder@hexbear.net 3 points 18 hours ago

I'm just curious what this plot even is