this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
828 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

20188 readers
457 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

To my knowledge it's lossless in CD quality only, in high-res modes it becomes lossy

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's nearly lossess if you can connect and maintain a 990kbps connection, but it still doesn't have enough bandwidth to do it truly lossless. I think it would require 1411kpbs to be actually lossless. It is still better than any codec I know of for bluetooth as far as that does, but bluetooth just kinda sucks for that sort of application.

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

1411 kbps before compression. FLACs can go as low as 200 kbps based on the content of a file

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Interesting. If that is so, then I am surprised that neither actually support actual lossless at that res without blowing up the noise floor.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

FLAC is a lossless compression format. It will reduce file size but keeps the audio quality. So-called "high-res" format on streaming platform like spotify (mandatory fuck spotify here) are usually mp3 320kbps so heavily compressed and lossy, indeed.