this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
1655 points (98.3% liked)

Fediverse

29492 readers
2246 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 39 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Signal is centralized, loops is closed source and not accepting new users.

[–] Esmoreit@lemmings.world 15 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Loops will be open sourced later they say.

Is Loops open source? It will be! We plan on open sourcing the platform after it reaches a stable and easy to maintain state.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 19 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

That really is not a satisfying answer. It is incredibly nebulous and even if it did have a nice definition I guarantee most software developers will tell you a lot of software rarely reaches that state.

I can see why they might want to avoid 1000 GitHub issues bike shedding things but they could open source the code and just not have open contribution

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Sometimes you’re ashamed of the ugly hacks you cobbled together to reach MVP, and you want to fix the stuff you know you need to fix first before being thrown to the wolves. I can respect that, for a limited time.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

or they can also disable submitting issues for now

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 9 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That means very little to me. Actions speak louder than words, and it would probably help the development of loops if it was actually open source.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

For a lot of FLOSS projects, it's common to keep the initial team small, so a product can be delivered fast, and gets opened up later.

It's to solve the "too many cooks" and prevent bikeshedding.

A lot of corpo espionage is there solely to tank potential competitors, which include FLOSS projects.

[–] MrRazamataz@lemmy.razbot.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Made by the same dev as Pixelfed, which did a similar thing.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Which I think dansup should deserve our trust on this for quite a long time for doing. It isn't empty promises if they already made Pixelfed and opensourced it.

Like.. I suppose it could be a grift, anything could but I see no reason to question their goals or motives.

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Loops is anti-libre software confirmed.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 13 hours ago

anti? is it against libre software? because it doesn't seem so

[–] stevo887@lemmings.world -2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Why does software have a political stance?

[–] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's missing a libre software licence text file.

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I was told that unless you self host, matrix is less secure because it leaks more metadata. Something to consider

[–] callyral@pawb.social 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Leaks more metadata? What does that mean?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

sender, recipient, chatroom, what kind of event you sent (message, emoji, reaction, vote), if you responded to a message, room privilege changes, etc

but it's a question how big of a problem is that. they want to tackle it in the future, but that's far away for now I think

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Damm, didn't know that, good to know

[–] breadcat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

it's not even true information, the new tech stack is zero trust

[–] Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] breadcat@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 minutes ago

the new cryptographic protocol protects metadata, like signal. the servers know nothing about any encrypted chats

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Zero trust means there’s no trust assumed on the protocol - I.e. it distrusts all actors and the protocol takes steps to work in that trustless environment. I don’t know how that applies specifically to matrix.