this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
135 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

1935 readers
231 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google "reconsiders" its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump's claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump's inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has "a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources."

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government "will file a civil suit" against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Elsewhere it’s referred to either Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America) or Gulf of America (Gulf of Mexico).

Except that people don't call it "Gulf of America" in those other places, even if Google is going out of its way to list it as if they did. Google is dictating "you should consider this a valid alternate name for the gulf", and Sheinbaum is fighting against it.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google is dictating "This is how it's referred to by one of the two countries encompassing the gulf". Is it dumb as fuck? Sure. But they're not deciding that people should be using it, only that in official terms, that is one of the names.

That doesn't mean you have to like it, or that it shouldn't be fought against... but it's not like they're some malevolent actor trying to get one over on the righteous hero either.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google is dictating “This is how it’s referred to by one of the two countries encompassing the gulf”.

It's also dictating that one name should be seen as as valid as the other. When it's simply not the case.

it’s not like they’re some malevolent actor trying to get one over on the righteous hero either.

They're doing this because money. And it's still the wrong thing, regardless of "malevolence" or not.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is not a righteous crusade for the downtrodden, you are not defending a moral outrage. It's a petty school yard slapfight.

It's annoying, but it's not diabolical. No one is functionally harmed by this, they just get a bruised ego.

On scales of capitalist damages in the world, this barely makes a ripple.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

righteous crusade [...] moral outrage... [diabolical] ...

Now you're just putting words in my mouth.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

As if you're on morally higher ground by defending the actions of corporations trying to appease a madman....

Anti Commercial-AI license