this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
1153 points (96.2% liked)

Comic Strips

14103 readers
3309 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 91 points 4 days ago (6 children)

There's research that found that people without children are happier than people with children.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 94 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The urge to cum inside is the siren song of many

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Vasectomy is a beautiful thing

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Get both, experience Nirvana

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

Literally millions of year of evolution behind the urge of raw dogging.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 4 days ago

Well, now I'm conflicted.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

According to this study, after adjusting for income, having children is actually associated with higher happiness and well-being.

From a Psychology Today article that summarizes it:

However, household income may not be a good indicator of financial stress. A family with low income that lives in an area with a low cost of living might experience less financial stress than a family with a higher income that lives in an area with a much higher cost of living. Therefore, the researchers conducted an additional analysis in which they included a direct measure of whether or not the family experienced difficulties in paying bills in the last year. This analysis showed that difficulties in paying bills represented a central influence factor for the relation of having children and parental well-being. When the researchers statistically controlled for financial difficulties, having children was actually related to greater well-being in parents.

[–] S3verin@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago

Thanks for citing your resources, unlike others.

so having kids makes you happier as long as you can pay your bills?

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The study also said that people with children felt more fulfilled over all 🤷‍♀️

They measured basically immediate happiness and long term happiness. In immediate happiness, the child free group won. In longterm happiness, the parents won. Did a lot of research into that before deciding to have a baby.

Just gotta decide what works best for you and your life style

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a kind of crazy blanket statement for actual researchers to make but then again sociology research.. well..

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Why is it crazy? It seems like the most sensible conclusion - no kids reduces stress significantly. Maybe in a world without need it’d be the other way around, but we don’t live in a post-scarcity society, do we?

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 22 points 4 days ago

mist Americans can’t afford kids, the main reason is simple as that

curious what happiness rates look like in real first world countries

[–] azzblaster@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago

Meaning has a lot to do with happiness and for me, my life has infinitely more meaning since the little one came along. A lot of people don’t need help finding meaning in their lives and that’s great, but taking care of my family is more rewarding than anything I have experienced. But yeah… not everyone is like me and that’s okay. Some people definitely shouldn’t have and/or don’t want kids and there’s nothing wrong with that.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Because it's a simplistic blanket statement about a very complex issue. You think you can take a single factor "kids = stress" and that's that?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, but I do believe that complex issues with many factors can be boiled down into simpler averages. Besides, “stress” is just as multifaceted of an issue as anything else! It implies nothing about the root causes.

Moreover, this research article did not say “if you have kids, you will be miserable”. That is a personal choice you should make for personal reasons. Some people are happier with kids! But it’s also true that childless adults are on average happier.

[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The article did not say that but the originator of this thread did.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

So nobody can arrive at any conclusions about complex topics? That's like saying we can't quantify global warning because climate science is complex.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm trying to imagine applying this logic to anything else.

Telling a friend not to try out for the baseball team, because playing baseball will increase your stress. Warning my sister not to watch a scary movie, because evidence shows they cause fear and discomfort. Breaking off a date with a cutie, because I've got butterflies and I don't want to feel anxious.

What do these sociologists think about rollercoasters or car races or heavy metal concerts, I wonder?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You’re trying to incorrectly put words in scientist’s mouths here.

They did not say that a person should not have children.

They merely said that on average, people who don’t have children are happier.

If people could accidentally find themselves trapped in a heavy metal concert, (just like people accidentally find themselves stuck being parents), you’d find a similar conclusion - people who don’t go to heavy metal concerts are happier. But it turns out that concerts are elective, so the effect is unlikely to be present in real life for concerts.

This has nothing to do with the “goodness“ of concerts or parenthood - both of them are awesome when the people doing them chose to do it!

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They didn't poll occupants of nursing homes?

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

if you think your kid is keeping you out of a nursing home i have news for you

better to make 3mil+ and get in a really good assisted living and a well payed lawyer

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

Or instead of banking on money and wealth to save you, just spend your money now, eat healthy, exercise and take care of your body.

It won't matter if you're 70 in an expensive care home and you don't know your name. I have a few elderly wealthy relatives in my wife's family who are in great care homes but have no clue where they are or who any one is.

And I've seen my fair share of people getting old in my family. It isn't pretty when you are constantly unwell and then your mind eventually falters and then fails.

Better to enjoy what you have now regardless if you have kids or not because none of us are guaranteed a good healthy mentally stable old age.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can add 1 more to their sample size that confirms this to be true.

[–] S3verin@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Glad that you feel happy. How do you know that this version of you is more happy than a version of you with kids?