this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

games

20978 readers
101 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Started a Baldur's Gate 3 playthrough (I pirated it because of course), and decided to roll a Paladin, as to roleplay a class struggle oriented fighter against oppression, next thing I know I'm stuck with a whole bunch of silly ass moral codes and liberal bullshit.

In the end the aristocratic ass elf that you can get as a companion is doing all the hard work not to break the RP of my main character and I'm hardly using it for the fun things (assassinating class enemies).

SMH

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

This is why I like what Paizo did with Pathfinder 2E

Paladin becomes a part of the Champion class, which are now martial fighters empowered with divine strength by their deity of choice rather than just a goody-goody who gets power that way

You want to be a Champion of the God of Freedom so you can go around freeing slaves and kicking slavers in the face? There you go, your God understands and condones your behavior

No puttering around being like "Oh, but I have to remain lawful and the law says slavery is legal"

Just good ol' fashioned smashing in a slavers face with an enchanted stein of mead and then setting everyone free

[–] CamaradeBoina@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

All I want is smiting slavers and oppressive assholes in the face regardless of their race, even if it means smashing a couple humans in too for their anti-goblin bullshit, with a shiny big hammer weilded by an ungenderable working class paragon.

Edit: credit given to credit due: BG3 has a really good character editor that really allows to fucking around with gender quite well Also Edit: props to Paizo with Pathfinder then, that's the way to do it.

[–] SaniFlush@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

The oath for lawful good Champions specifically states that Good trumps Lawful in every case, so it doesn’t matter if you’re “out of your jurisdiction”. Characters with an oath to destroy certain creature types aren’t obligated to perform kamikaze charges against impossible odds or pointlessly murder a token Good aligned example of that monster, either.

The most restrictive Champion is probably the Neutral Good one, since they have the whole Steven Universe “everyone gets a second chance, no matter how dumb the offer is” thing going on. Their smite is replaced with an automatic counter-attack though, so refusing is a bad idea.

load more comments (3 replies)