this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
142 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

459 readers
131 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe, but even if we did reshore it, Boeing is still likely going to be losing money compared to Airbus, as american manufacturing is notorious for being expensive. The cost of manufacturing out of a garage is likely prohibitively expensive, as the difficult part isn't necessarily doing the manufacturing, but making sure the part is made to quality standards, something that the manufacturer is financially responsible for. Most garage manufacturers aren't going to be used to holding the tolerances needed for Boeing. If they were, Boeing likely would already be doing it.

[โ€“] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm surprised I don't hear more people talking about this. Even if we do reshore all our manufacturing, which seems impossible, how would we even be able to sell our stuff? It would be too expensive.