"... Moreover, intact linguistic abilities do not entail intact thinking abilities. Together, this evidence suggests that language is unlikely to be a critical substrate for any form of thought. "

LLMs BTFO and they arent even talking about AI

The quote from the neurobiologists at the end is really great too but its long so i wont copy it.

Really good read overall even if I dont really understand the math parts of it, sadly - also not sure about the whole will-transmission bit. Mostly in how its phrased in tenet 1 as opposed to how the neuroscience stuff vindicates "will-transmission". seems more like its vindicating language as purely communicative as opposed to "commands given to others" how its laid out in the tenet as stated. it feels like a jump.