this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
1089 points (96.9% liked)

Comic Strips

16573 readers
2059 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] elDalvini@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Alt text:

ISO 8601 was published on 06/05/88 and most recently amended on 12/01/04.

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

But… that’s not the right way. Are you saying the ISO8601 violates ISO8601?

  • so, apparently not I just whooshed, I didn’t even noticed the dates are ambiguous.
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 55 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The joke is that they've not been given in ISO8601 format, and also that they're both ambiguous. For the second one, we can't even tell which of the ends is the year.

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly Randall absolutely would put the year in the middle just to fuck with us

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Publication 1988-06-05, latest amendment 2004-12-01.

I almost expected the two dates to use different formats, but no, they're just both "the American way".

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

Well you can only cram in so many jokes at once. Would have been funny though

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Knowing Americans it's probably the middle.

[–] erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

You found the joke

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Might be the best xkcd alt text of all time. I knew if from memory, and as soon as I saw the comic I thought "I bet someone quoted the alt text in the top comment".