this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
656 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7611 readers
2838 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 140 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

I've heard these described as a "legally acceptable way of filtering out people with autism" and man I've not seen them the same way since.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

Not that I necessarily think they're trying to discriminate against people with autism giving blood, but there's one of these on the blood donation intake questionnaire.

Intake Questionnaire: In the last year, have you used any illegal drugs via needle injection?

Me: No.

IQ: In the last year, have you had sex with anyone who uses illegal drugs via needle injection?

Me (married): Well, it's not as if I can keep an eye on my wife 24/7... you know what, I'm just going to mark it No.

IQ: In the last year, have you had sex for money?

Me: No.

IQ: In the last year, have you had sex with anyone who has had sex for money?

Me: I'M TELLING YOU, I CAN'T KEEP AN EYE ON HER AT ALL TIMES, SO FUNDAMENTALLY I CANNOT GIVE A CERTAIN ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION!

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Masking takes care of this, but possibly not for all.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

In what way? Are autistic people more likely to value company profits over personal goals?

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 8 hours ago

Not really, in this case the more literally you read the question the better. It asks what responsibility you acquire when you have a job not why you got the job.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 47 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I have had a theory that the personality tests are just to have an excuse to discriminate with plausible deniability.

[–] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 hours ago

Yep quite a few years back I had two jobs lined up , already got the first but the second one wanted a second interview after I filled in a 50 page personality test. I felt the first offer would be interesting and better paid but wanted to see what they offered. So I said why not just be completely honest instead of faking it :) very interesting interview, I just told them that whoever sold them this idea was probably a very good salesman. The tool is just pointless. I got to much risk taking etc , yea I like skydiving.. I'm not skydiving at work. .. if you want people to bullshit you it's pretty good though haha

[–] Caesium@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago

yep when I applied to work at target a few years ago, there should have been absolutely no reason for them to not consider me but I took that thiny veiled screening test and wow I suddenly don't get a response.

fuck corpos man

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 21 points 14 hours ago

That explains a LOT.