this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)
GenZedong
4557 readers
113 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can see why you would feel that way, but I think the US wouldn't want a color revolution occurring in KSA. I mean who would fund a color revolution there?
China is a big no.
Russia has its hands full w/Ukraine.
Iran is already invested in its other fronts.
Europe is struggling bc of Ukraine and now Trump.
There really is no one else to fund this that could benefit from it.
I don't think isntrael is dumb enough to try a color revolution with its 2nd strongest ally.
This might be real, but we should wait before coming to conclusions.