news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
view the rest of the comments
I wouldn't care how old they were if they're weren't fucking genocidal ghouls
Honestly I would care. Like I would prefer non-genocidal old people than genocidal young ones, but I do think being old is inherently a problem for being in elected office
Cognitive decline is obviously a big concern, as well as the possibility of them just dropping dead like 3 already have. Also it distances them from the concerns of the much younger population.
But also on a more basic level I don’t trust them, they don’t have skin in the game. “Don’t order food for the table right before you leave the restaurant.” Things like climate change aren’t as real of a concern to someone in their 70s because they won’t be around to experience the worst of it. Like honestly I’m iffy on if people over retirement age should even be allowed to vote, let alone be in elected office.
Lower the voting age to 14, eliminate any age floors for elected offices, and introduce a ceiling that you can’t run for office if you’re over 65.
That would open entirely another bag of crabs libertarian approaches
Comrade, I would trust a 75 year old before a 14 year old, any day. What the hell does my nephew know about current events other than the latest skibidi toilet lore? Leave the minimums where they are, just put some maximums in place.
I very strongly disagree. I’ve had intelligent conversations with many 14 year olds, whether they throw in a skibidi toilet reference or not.
Every time I talk to a 75 year old I have to explain how basic things work that they should absolutely know and then tell them “You can’t say that about Mexican people.”
Have you ever been in a car with a 75+ year old driver? They can’t navigate a parking lot and are consistently baffled by the concept that signs could instruct them where to go.
The average 14 year old knows more about climate change and how to stop it than half of the senate. I think you’re really underestimating the capacity of teenagers.
And I didn’t say 14 year olds should be in office, just that they should be allowed to vote. It’s a very low bar.
Edit: whoops I did say lower voting age to 14 and remove floors for office, never mind. I’ll take lower voting age to 14 and lower floors for office to 18, because people under 18 should be banned from any employment anyway.
Honestly though when it comes down to it if you gave me a gun-to-my-head choice between a random 14 year old and a random 75 year old as president I would probably pick the 14 year old. If it was random 14 year old or random 85 year old I’m definitely picking the 14 year old.
Thats just an extreme comparison though, I am in no way saying a 14 year old should be president.
To be honest I wouldn’t trust either.
I don’t think as a 14 year old I had the nuanced experience of the world that I would want to be voting. No experience of life. No context. Just not had enough time to come to a considered conclusion.
At the other end of the scale I don’t think I’d trust most 75 year olds to set up an internet contract, let alone decide the future of a nation when they have no skin in the game. I think below 18 you’re probably still a kid. But if you’re old enough join the army and die for your country that seems like as good place as any to say you’re old enough to have a say on the country.
So I’d say votes from age 18-70.
High schoolers are very much aware of the state of politics and also seriously impacted by it. Shouldn’t the people most impacted by school boards, who absolutely have the capacity to understand what school board members are doing, have a say in who those members are?
I think you’re really underestimating the capacity and life experience of teenagers. They’re people. Especially if you’re not just looking at upper middle class white teenagers. A lot of 14 year olds have jobs. Like not even just under the table stuff, like W2 employment. If you’re having taxes taken out of your paychecks that you earn you should 100% be allowed to vote.
I don’t think 14 is an unreasonable line to set, and I think anything above 16 is deeply unjust. Many countries have 16 as the voting age, including Cuba, Brazil, Austria, Argentina, and most of the UK’s weird territories like Jersey and the Isle of Man.
Ultimately I don’t even really think there’s a serious downside to letting any and every resident of the country vote. Regardless of citizenship status, regardless of age, regardless of felony status. Prisoners currently in prison should be able to vote. 5 year olds should be able to vote. Why not? It hardly matters, and it’s not like the 5 year olds demographic is gonna be making serious swings in polling.
Yeah sure, but you can take that argument further, why not a 13 year old, why not a 12 year old etc.. at some point you have to make a call on the maturity of a child in their ability to be decision makers who can make a sensible decision. As an alternative, I think youth councils who can feed into decision making in a real way (not a patronising toothless way) are a very good thing to feedback into the decision making system.
To turn your argument the other way though, should 85 year olds who are the most likely to be in receipt of social care and health care not have a say in how society provisions it? Additionally many old people are in work and paying taxes, surely they should get a say?
I don’t think 16 is a stupid age at all. Definitely a good argument to be made for that. Same with anyone paying taxes from their pay. In the uk that would be 16 - I can’t speak for the USA.
While I agree, it's just another thing to emphasize just how out of touch these ghouls are.
Yeah it takes a while for the hate for your fellow man to accumulate over time within democrats to get them to the point when they hate humanity enough to run the democratic platform.