this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2414 readers
91 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
felipeforte@lemmygrad.ml
49
"Limited nuclear war" (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 4 days ago by Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml to c/comradeship@lemmygrad.ml
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I recently read this article from John Bellamy foster where he mentions that the US strategists think they can engage in "limited nuclear war", that is, use nuclear weapons on "tactical" targets and keep nuclear war at a "low" level.

Supposedly, the idea is that the US moves up from low level targets to more important targets, and that at each stage, the Chinese will not escalate because escalation would be top costly for the Chinese (since the Chinese only have ICBMs, their only option of escalation is MAD).

Aparantly, this strategy has also become part of official US doctrine.

My first thought on this is that this strategy is completely insane, because China will not allow it to be played out. If 1 nuke goes off all of them go off.

My second thought on this is that I have no idea what the actual Chinese nuclear policy is, other than their statement to never use nukes in a first strike capacity. Does anybody know of any sources that go into detail on this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 days ago

This is the scariest shit ever to be honest, because the most likely scenario is that any nuclear exchange is likely to escalate to a full blown nuclear war. The fact that he imbeciles running Burgerland think they can have a limited nuclear war means they have completely lost their minds.