this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
173 points (98.3% liked)

news

24109 readers
859 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 72 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'd love it if this was true, but let's be a bit less credulous shall we? No photos, no evidence, no named quotes, no location.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Should be taken with a grain of salt till more evidence surfaces, they are claiming they captured a pilot. If that's the case we'll probably see some solid evidence soon. Given that Yemen nearly shot one down, I don't think it's that much of a stretch.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago

seems like might be a generated image

[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Haha that's fake as hell!

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] Hermes@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These are fake, as mentioned elsewhere

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 3 days ago

ah, I guess we'll have to wait some more

[–] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Definitely fake, likely a generated image.

Compared to a real F-35 the geometry doesn't match up. If the wings and horizontal stabilizers broke off we would at the least see holes where they were supposed to be. The grass in the immediate vicinity would probably not be untouched like we see in the image. Lastly, AI struggles to differentiate between vehicle debris, building rubble, ashes, and clutter, so wreckage in those kinds of images tends to look like a mix of all of the above.

Im sure that Iran has the capability to down a vehicle of such a type, but I'm waiting for third-party confirmation before poppin bottles.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah seems like I jumped the gun on that one

[–] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hope I didn't make you feel bad :(

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

nah, it's my bad for getting too excited

[–] Shaleesh@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think we all are to some degree. There's a lot of shit going down and theres probably as much information warfare going on as there is actual warfare right now so I can't really blame you.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago

For sure, and thanks for the kind words. :)

Yeah, intact fuselage too. That doesn't happen.

[–] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Iran has not officially released ANYTHING. Iran has confirmed hits on 3 F35 planes and 1 F16 plane, but ANY PICTURE YOU SEE IS FAKE. Russia's Sputnik has also reported one of those F35 hits.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Also, you know, the engine is still very much on.

(I do not want to make op feel bad either, def a nice analysis by Shaleesh too, the rear stabiliser is F22 shaped - but the engine, it's just so funny to me how it's the centrepiece of the pic, an image so unique and stand-outish it just triggers some situational/prop humour for me.)

[–] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

This is not a true picture. This is an older MiG.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine feeding AI slop to the masses & adding to the prompt "oh, and make it so that its anus is still glowing like it's at full speed"

[–] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

This is an older MiG plane, it has been mistakenly or maliciously resurfaced by media