this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
356 points (98.1% liked)

Political Memes

8495 readers
3111 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I agree they’re putting out feelers but I don’t think they’ll get traction. I didn’t find anyone calling for direct US intervention, mainly just indirect support for Israel. Who was saying that?

I also found some leaders explicitly saying the US should not get involved. I guess it feels a lot different from the post-9/11 years when it felt like only political radicals were opposed to war, and basically every mainstream voice was cheering it on. So that’s why I’m a bit more optimistic.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Well, just to follow up...

US President Donald Trump said in a Sunday interview wih ABC News that the United States might get involved in the Iran-Israel conflict and expressed openness to having Russian President Vladimir Putin act as a mediator.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, here's the start of a NYT article

Israel’s overnight missile strike against Iran divided Congress, drawing praise and strong support from members of both parties, but some lawmakers, most of them Democrats, expressed concern about regional instability and the risk the United States might be drawn directly into the conflict.

Many members of Congress were quick to cheer Israel’s actions and framed them as a justified response to Tehran’s refusal to abandon its ambition to obtain nuclear weapons. Others, including several leading Democrats, urged restraint, warning about the potential for escalation.

And later on

“There is no circumstance where Iran can be permitted to become a nuclear power,” Mr. Jeffries said in a statement, adding an urgent call for international leaders to “find a rigorous diplomatic path forward and avoid any situation where U.S. troops are put in harm’s way.”

Search is basically unusable at this point, but here's fetterman calling for strikes a couple months back, he's been consistently one of the loudest

My point is, no one is explicitly saying we should go to war with Iran... But there's a lot of talk of strikes. No one is saying we should give Israel troops... Just "everything they need, intelligence, arms, everything"

What I'm hearing is a whole lot of not ruling out troops on the ground. From both parties, with not nearly enough resistance

I do hope you're right, but I'm getting very concerned. Not so much on the draft (I think we're a good ways off from there) but from us going to war, and if that goes well doing it again.

If it happens and the resistance isn't strong enough... Well, authoritarians often use war to stay in power