this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
272 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2522 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)

This is my main problem with hydrogen cars. I think it's a very cool concept that might eventually overtake pure electric cars but there's almost no places to get hydrogen yet.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It isn't going to overtake electric cars, too inefficient.

But it might be the future for airplanes, which need a lot more energy density.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago

But it might be the future for airplanes, which need a lot more energy density.

Specifically density by weight. By volume, which is more important to cars, hydrogen also loses.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes also cargo ships and possibly American sized semi trucks. Although semis are right on border of battety vs hydrogen.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"American sized?"

There are semis all over the world...

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yean but aren't the trucks in america large. I have seen memes making fun american semi compared to smaller loris.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The trucks in Japan and Europe honestly seemed just as large, albeit the can be were shorter. But then there is Canada and Mexico which trucks are identical.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The problem with long distance airliners though is that the turbofan powered engine has such a huge power output that is only possible using a turbine.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It also requires dedicated infrastructure. EVs can have charging stations at basically anywhere with a power hookup (or a genset. A grocery store here puts small VAWTs to charge off of in their parking lots. And every new-ish building has added charging stations to some of their spaces.

Hydrogen cars would need refueling stations with dedicated pressurized gas hookups, tanks, and fill machines. And the tanks and the tankers to keep the tanks full.

Finally the ultimate problem is it’s rather low energy density.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

And all that infrastructure is a problem that doesn’t need solving with EVs. An entire industry we don’t need to build/rebuild

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought hydrogen had the highest energy density, like it's #1 in that metric.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

By mass, sure, but not by volume; and that usually doesn’t take into account the mass of the tanks, and hydrogen is rather difficult to keep from leaking.

In cars we’re more concerned about volume than mass, in which it performs very low- aluminum as a fuel actually leads that (but is … impractical…)

For cars, amonia would be the better choice and can be synthesized at home fairly easily. It’s still fairly low energy, though. About the same as hydrogen

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Something else no one has said yet (I think) is that most hydrogen is produced from natural gas, so this is in no way a climate solution. It's been sold as one and it's bullshit.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago

While producing hydrogen from natural gas is cheaper, this company claims to produce it with electrolysis

But IMHO at the moment is a waste of energy

[–] UniquesNotUseful@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes but not for long.

As (generally climate denying) people love to point out, wind and solar is erratic power generation. For this reason you need triple capacity Vs requirements.

This means that for a huge amount of time you'll have excess energy, once we start to be predominantly renewables, battery storage is expensive. One of the solutions is to create hydrogen, also pumped hydrogen, etc.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The ones in Denmark were green hydrogen, made from water electrolysis.

[–] rentar42@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think it'll overtake electric cars? The energy efficiency of hydrogen cars is significantly worse, as they introduce some extra steps in pipeline of energy-generation -> movement.

The only major advantage they have is "ICE-like" fuelling, which has a bunch of major caveats attached to it (as in: it's nowhere near as simple a system as ICE refuelling. Everything from generation, to transport to getting-it-in-the-car is way more complex and thus expensive and error-prone).

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait getting in the car is more complex?

[–] night_of_knee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I hadn't thought of it before but it's obvious, hydrogen is a gas at room temperature, it had to be stored under pressure in order to get any significant mass into the volume of a tank. So it's under pressure in the refueling station and in the car's tank. How does it get from one to the other without boiling away?

[–] supercriticalcheese@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Hydrogen is a gas, under very high pressure but you will never find it in a liquid form unless you cool it down to -250 C or so. It's not used in liquid form for such applications.

There is though the need to chill the hydrogen to about -20/-40C before delivery to the vehicles due to some anomalous properties of hydrogen respect to ever other gas known to humans.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

oh there are a few ways. One group is researching turning H2 into a paste. the paste mixes with water and breaks down into water and Ca+ ions. You now have a energy density around liquid hydrogen and it only add some calcium to the exhaust. There is also storing hydrogen in metal disks.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I dunno, everything I've always seen on it made it seem like a hyper-specific solution that's more suited to a few edge cases that could have their specific infrastructure.

For the average consumer, the recharging of EVs is actually Not A Big Deal™️. It seemed like one at first. Now all it does is ensure I take hourly short breaks which I should have been doing anyways, basically. The only big upside of Hydrogen is the ability to refill very quickly, but you pay with a whole bunch of downsides like inefficient generation, inefficient transportation, secondary infrastructure, energy inefficiency, etc.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You also can’t fill up at home!

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Hydrogen also only manages fast refills with a break between vehicles. If you try and fill a lot of cars in a row like gas pumps do, you have to wait much longer while it compresses and cools the hydrogen.

So the number of hydrogen pumps you need to support fuel cell EVs winds up being similar to the number of fast chargers BEVs need, and hydrogen pumps are very expensive.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Those "edge cases" are major industrial processes that drive the modern industrial economy. Like steel making and ammonia production.

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're still electric cars at their base. They just use a hydrogen reactor in lieu of a battery to power the motors.

I don't see a future where hydrogen supplants electric cars, unless there's some revolution in storage technology for it. In that case, progress in battery tech is more likely.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is there even a possibility of better storage tech for hydrogen? It's not like batteries where you can use different elements in the battery out of different things. It has to store hydrogen. The processes surrounding that can be made more efficient, but the storage is just a physical limitation, not chemical.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

not really. It's a gas. and a really low density one at that. physics is a bitch

[–] endhits@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think there is, but I also gave up on predicting the future a while ago.

[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Another problem to the already mentioned ones (expensive, expensive dedicated infrastructure needed) is the range. Hydrogen is not very energy dense. For example the Toyota Mirai has a range of 500 km (310 miles) and its a pretty big, fuel-efficient car and the fuel storage is as big as the vehicle allows it.

So while you can refuel faster than electric, you need to do it more frequently and its less convenient.

[–] bluetoque@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's wrong with that range? It's bigger than my bladder.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just spitballing here, please pretend I'm some rando on the Internet and not some kind of expert.

On its own, there's not much wrong with it. It takes a little longer to fill than a normal gas dispenser, but not bad. But you'll still need to put hydrogen fuel stations everywhere similar to gas stations now.

Hydrogen's biggest competitor is pure electric. I love my EV in part because I can charge at home. There's just something really nice about waking up to a full battery every day, and realizing you haven't been to a gas station in months (I have an ICE as well, but it's not my daily driver). Having to go to a fueling station every week or so again would feel like a big step backward, especially if we need to create a from-scratch infrastructure for it. We already have power lines pretty much everywhere, and can generate power relatively easily, so much of the hard part is done.

Going back to range: in theory this problem could be alleviated if the range were enough that one had to refuel less often, but going through all that trouble to be in a similar situation to what you've had, when a better alternative exists? Nah.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

500km is pretty close to the typical range for gas vehicles(500-600 usually).

[–] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The XLE does 410 miles. Few electric vehicle can touch that and EV ranges decline over time so almost no EV that's more than a couple years old could match it.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same problem with gas waaaaay back in the day.

True, but "gas" is not a gas in the way that hydrogen is a gas. Hydrogen presents some unique storage and distribution issues.