1027
submitted 11 months ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nickknack@lemmy.world 188 points 11 months ago

the idea that sick days somehow impose a financial burden of the company is a blatant lie of criminal proportions. It is a justification for wage theft

people should use all of their sick days

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 68 points 11 months ago

Why do you even have an allocation of sick days? It's not really a concept anywhere I've worked (in the UK).

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 57 points 11 months ago

I’m in the US and I get 3 paid sick days a year. Anything more and I don’t get paid PLUS I get a point. After 8 points I lose my job. We come to work sick unless we are in the hospital.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 85 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If Americans knew what workers rights were they'd be very angry to realise they have none.

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Most Americans still have their hears shoved so far up their asses that they think all of Europe is a freedomless third world region where the governments silence all criticism and doctors still use leeches or something. Just completely delusional and in denial.

Of course most Americans haven't even left their own state, never mind gone to Europe to experience it themselves.

[-] braxy29@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

i mean... i would like to go to europe, but where on earth do i find the time off work and the money to do it?

that americans are not better traveled is not entirely the fault of their attitudes. it's easier for your average european to travel internationally for a number if reasons, both practical and systemic.

edit - for many americans, international travel is a privilege.

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You're right, it is a great privilege. I've never left the U.S. either. But I'm also not a fucking dumbass MURICAMAN that thinks a $5000 bill for a broken arm and 3 sick days a year is something to be grateful for.

I'm able to see that my country is super fucked up and that mlst of Europe seem to do most things better.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 14 points 11 months ago

No, we have worker's rights -- not enough, but you do have rights. Federal and state labor law covers a surprisingly broad number of topics.

Shitty employers want you to think you don't have rights, because they want to continue to illegally exploit you.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

https://www.fairwork.gov.au

Look up what you could have and tell me if it actually compares.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

Like to have some more of those rights? Consider joining a union.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

This is because, so far, it’s up to the state’s to regulate, if they even do.

Ex: in Colorado, the minimum PTO is 48 hours per year.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

This is an American misapprehension. Even in your most worker friendly states you have extremely sub-par workers rights for a first world country.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

But it’s also a misunderstanding of how the US is governed and regulated. It’s setup more like Europe than people realize.

And yes, we’re fully aware of how much most of us are getting screwed on worker’s rights for time off. People in other countries don’t think we’re aware but we are. The question becomes, how do you fight for more rights? Our politicians absolutely suck. That’s the main issue. The two party system doesn’t work but we can’t agree what to do about it.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Strike, fight, bleed, die.

We have ours because us and our ancestors already fought and died against our oppressors to get them.

You have two choices, die for your overlords, or die for your rights.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That’s an option but it would have to be something so heinous, to push us to unite, I couldn’t fathom it. Nothing, so far, has pushed us to that point.

Think about how many mass shootings we’ve had and that still doesn’t unite us. The issue is more complex than our European friends understand.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yep. And that's the American value system. Having your entire population under the veritable yoke of slavery and that isn't enough to make you collectively revolt.

Civility breeds cowardice.

[-] polle@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago

That is fucking insane. The burden for everyone who gets sincerely sick and is horrible fucked. Its just sad.

[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

My last job had no sick days. I would get no pay for the day and a point, and at 6 points you're gone.

The job I have now ALSO has no sick days, but at least the attendance policy is so lax I can literally skip 2/3 shifts and stay employed. Still no pay, but it's a bit less shitty than my last job.

The bar is so fucking low I don't think ground penetrating radar could find it.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

Might be worth checking the flowchart to see if you're eligible for FMLA leave. If you are and they're denying you sick leave The Department of Labor would love to hear about it -- they don't screw around.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 months ago

I read FMLA as Fuck My Life America.

(Not American)

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 31 points 11 months ago

I'm always amazed by how Americans in particular (sorry if you're not, I'm assuming) tend to go from one end of the spectrum to the other without any middle stops in common sense land. I once had a US friend go straight from "we have bad health care" to "we need a violent revolution" with no consideration to... you know, maybe good health care?

I mean, from my perspective it seems pretty obvious that you should only take as many sick days as you need, but you should take all the ones you need, to an unlimited total amount.

Like, that seems so simple. It's how it's always worked in the multiple countries I've lived in. You're sick? You call in sick. You need to be off for multiple days? You ask your doctor to officially declare that you're sick. The company is taking a hit? The government covers your wages during your long term sickness.

This works. We know this works. It's obvious this works.

[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

We don't believe that the government will let us have good Healthcare without revolution at this point. One side violently opposes it and the other dangles it like a carrot on a stick for votes, with no intention of actually providing it because if they actually improved things somewhat they'd lose a precious bargaining chip. This song and dance has been going on for as long as I've been alive. We're losing hope here.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

See? But that's the thought process that I find baffling. Because I can't find an American who doesn't claim to be dissatisfied, so... how do you land in that mix of conformism, where you don't think you can take political action of any sort to address it, but also extremism, where you think the logical endgame is full on armed conflict?

How do you massage a whole continent-sized country's psyche into just sitting there and taking it right up until the point where you start shooting people? I'm not even French and even I can see the glaring hole full of mass protesting right in the middle of that crap.

And hey, not to spoil any big secrets, but the US is literally the only democracy that hasn't rewritten its constitution fundamentally since its creation. You guys know that's allowed, right? Go argue for a proportional system or a parliamentary system or something. I mean, you guys could try doing something at all before deciding that it's full-on purge time.

[-] ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

Because if we try to change anything, we run the (very high) risk of losing our jobs, then our homes, and ending up on the streets. If you have a way to get over 300 million people all on the same page for a general strike, who are all willing to risk losing their income, please let me know.

[-] SciRave@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think this really addresses the question. Revolution provides even more of an economic disruption?

Keep in mind the OP is not an American. They don't have the context.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

We are protesting. So far we've been at best ignored, and at worst...

You've probably seen what our police are like.

[-] SciRave@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm American and it's never made much sense to me, either.

Afaik it's fundementally 5 forces.

  • Severe distrust of the established institutions, including the democratic process.
  • Long-drawn, multi-generational unrest ever since late globalization and the decline of unions.
  • Anti-labor propaganda and institutional complacency.
  • Increased alienation and in-fighting among the population. Got much worse ever since the MAGA repubs cropped up. We're fighting against 40-50% of the population for basic shit. (Have you seen our paralyzed congress?)

Finally, this unwillingness to be the first to bite the bullet. Inevitably, the first people to start off these grassroots movements are going to get the shortest end of the stick. They are people sacrificing their free time and economic security for a movement that begs others to do the same.

It's a massive risk.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

FWIW, I do recognize all of those from the outside looking in.

I also recognize that you have so few protections that action is riskier than it is here, where protesting can't be legally retaliated against and there are actual labor protections in place that make effecting change easier. Which in turn is part of the expectation that the government should proactively help you when you need it.

But still, it does seem like there should be a middle point somewhere where you get rid at least of point one and you tip over point three, right? That seems like it'd happen way before stuff gets really violent.

But then, culturally you guys fantasize about violently confronting the government since day one, which I guess is what happens when your foundational myth is also a colonial-revolutionary myth.

It is pretty messed up, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] notacat@mander.xyz 13 points 11 months ago

Did you just say the government pays regular citizens?? Where I come from that’s communism. Governments are only supposed to pay corporations like the good lord intended.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Well, no, they do. They pay your boss to pay you. Or they pay you instead of your boss. Either way your boss gets stuff, so... yay capitalism?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

A common tactic for startups is to offer "unlimited days off" knowing that people won't take days off.

Best part for them is that because you don't have specific days to take off they don't have to pay you for them when you quit.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

because I am a big gobshite, I always mention this. They ask for feedback about benefits in most companies, I always say, "yeah you say unlimited time off but I'm not allowed to take 365 consecutive days?"

two separate companies have changed it to "flexible time off" because of my inability to keep my trap shut

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don’t know if that’s reality though. Part of my new job’s compensation package that I negotiated in was unlimited days off. I’ve already taken a vacation I wouldn’t have been able to with my previous job. I know better than to abuse the privilege but the trade off of not getting it paid out on exit is already worth it for me.

[-] FFbob@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I get 5% extra per year saved of sick leave on my pension, up to 2 years, adjusted to percent of the year left of sick leave. But my job is fun and people tend to want to work.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
1027 points (98.1% liked)

Not The Onion

11846 readers
678 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS