156
I would just quit. (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 28 points 10 months ago

And specifically, inventing demand by removing alternatives. Like with IoT devices. They invent demand by removing alternative designs, raise the price because it's premium, then use those devices to spy on your and sell data to create a sort of rent based model where you pay with your privacy.

Alternatively they just refuse to even sell you the IoT device and force you to rent it from them.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 25 points 10 months ago

IoT stuff is so frustrating, because the useful aspects are overwhelmed by the need to make it profitable. I DIY'd an environment tracking setup totally local on my network to keep track of things like temp/humidity because I've got some sensitive acoustic instruments and I need to know when they need to go in their case/get a wet sponge/break out the dehumidifier. Now I have a historical graph of temp/humidity/air quality cycles in my apartment.

I bought a "IoT" power strip because I wanted individually addressable outlets for things like lamps and monitors and centralize the interface but fuckin TPlink took away the python API access and requires an account and so it sits in its box until I can possibly reverse engineer it enough to either write my own firmware or just hotwire the relays for my own purposes.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 12 points 10 months ago

Could you get around that API limitation by routing control through OpenHAB or Home Assistant?

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 11 points 10 months ago

The only way to control it currently is via an app you need an account for so it removes any ability to be an offline device. Its within my skillset to dump the flash and try to patch it, it should be running some embedded linux firmware going by the mediatek chip in the FCC declarations.

I've just had other stuff going on and didn't feel like dealing with it after the initial disapointment. There is the possibility of regaining the python api but that still requires making a tp-link account and connecting the device to the internet period, so I'm not a fan.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 9 points 10 months ago

I'm sad that there aren't more "generic" devices out there that just use standard free protocols

[-] Kynuck97@hexbear.net 7 points 10 months ago

For real, so many proprietary applications that will almost certainly just lose support within the decade, rendering the device useless if it can only be used with that particular app.

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 4 points 10 months ago

Exactly, and the apps usually suck. I'm planning on just buying a bunch of ESP32 chips and some relays and building my own out of regular powerstrips. I already have a hacky digital switch I spliced into my 3d printer power chord, can't be too hard to slap one in line with a commercial power strip.

[-] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 20 points 10 months ago

They invent demand by removing alternative designs, raise the price because it's premium, then use those devices to spy on your and sell data to create a sort of rent based model where you pay with your privacy.

I HATE SMART TVS

I HATE SMART TVS

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
156 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23181 readers
552 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS