No, it's not tone, it's content. You've been very clear that you aren't generalizing, you're talking very intentionally about all religions. That's just not true. A pretty big majority of the people here are atheist, agnostic, irreligious and so on, but this really isn't the place for New Atheism, stuff you'd hear from Sam Harris or whoever.

To give an illustrative example, growing up I learned about the role of trans people in religious practices across Polynesia. In Hawai'i and Tahiti they're called mahu, in NZ they're whakawahine, in Samoa fa'afafine and fa'afatama, in Tonga and some other areas they say fakafafine. Very similar concepts in all those areas. In precolonial Hawai'i mahu were very important to religious practice especially as healers, and as teachers or kumu, who also hold a sort of spiritual reverence in general. These are real, modern religions practiced very seriously by many native Hawai'ians. They give devotion to deities considered by some practicers to be genderfluid, like the god/goddess of hula and fertility. I know they have a similar trans deity in the Philippines. When Christian missionaries came they did their best to stamp all of that shit out, especially anything to do with gender fluidity or same sex partners, and within a few decades they turned "mahu" into a slur, which survives today as queer Hawai'ians, including religious leaders, try to push back on it.

That's just one area of the world that I particularly know about, this is true of a lot of other indigenous people because they've resisted conversion to Abrahamic religions, which are generally considered textually cisheteronormative, and other major religions that also lend themselves to that.

Explicitly calling all of them fundamentally bad for queer people and refusing to differentiate between head-on-a-pike zealots and the people whose culture they're stamping out is a western-centric position of neutrality. And neutrality always favors the oppressor. On top of that, it's foreclosing on the concept of any superstition that people might use to push away some existential dread that doesn't include a clause about hating queer people. This type of rhetoric is regularly used to provide cover from liberals for various imperialist causes, and it's putting a slander on people who've had no such habit like the bible thumpers and witch burners.

I agree with this as well.