this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
1010 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59296 readers
4621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1010
Meta faces permanent ban on targeted ads across Europe (stackdiary.com)
submitted 1 year ago by skilledtothegills@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Norway has succeeded in getting the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to make permanent and extend across Europe its ban on Meta (Facebook's parent company) harvesting user data for targeted ads on Facebook and Instagram.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

a targeted advertising ban would kill just about every social media platform

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could just run contextual ads for much less effort and privacy violations, and still get the same or better result.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why do you think that would get "the same or better result"?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's how advertising worked for literally the entire history of advertising before the modern internet. You put ads for car stuff on the cars website. You don't need to build an entire dossier on me. If I'm looking at the star wars wiki, you can be pretty confident that I'm interested in sci-fi and fantasy. You don't need to spend billions of dollars tracking me to know that.

This is not an expert opinion so I could be wrong, but I think it would be a better system. Simpler to implement, less stalking, less "oops we didn't show any house ads to black people" potential.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

these companies spend a lot of money and computation power on intelligent targeting systems because they are in fact better from a capitalist perspective

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe. I guess it makes it easier for Google to sell many different ads in the same time/space. Still sucks for everyone else though.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

the companies optimize for profit and nothing else. you do not matter.

[–] ArghZombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But people advertise with Google precisely because they know the ads will be targeted at relevent people. If Google just sell loads of ad slots that just show to random users then that's just a waste of money. If I'm selling motorbike helmets I don't want to waste my money having Google show those ads to 60 year old men who only travel by bus or golfers or people who use wheelchairs.

Google won't just sell loads of ads here, they'll totally change their business model to something closer to the targetting approach.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 year ago

You target the ads based on the content of the page rather than the identity of the viewer. That's how tv radio and print ads work.