this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
1456 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3179 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If it's called NASA Plus, how is it free? The "plus" means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

Don't get me wrong this is absolutely fantastic I adore NASA and space, but they're just be some hidden cost? Otherwise it wouldn't be a streaming service called NASA Plus, right?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 103 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The “plus” means it goes a step beyond their free content and into a paid tier.

Notepad++ enters the chat

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's actually Notepad+, plus it's free

[–] ThetaDev@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, it is Notepad++ and it is called like that because it is written in C++.

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sure C++ isn't just C+, plus it's free?

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They say it's free but that's how they get ya. It'll only cost your soul!

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe the real cost was the friends we lost along the way.

[–] motsu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] ChewTiger@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think everyone sat down and agreed to that being what plus means. It's like labeling food as organic, it means nothing. It's just a name. Odd thing to obsess over, you'll get nowhere trying to understand marketing people, just let it go.

What they are adding is a more condensed experience accessing NASA content and making it easier for casual viewers to access. The more people paying attention to science the better. I think this is a fantastic move from NASA

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Compared to the standards for organic in civilized countries, that's basically nothing.

[–] thereisalamp@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you know how many companies use just organic, and not "usda certified organic"

Most

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like how confident you are about your answer.

However, perusing the USDA website one comes across this set of "strongly" worded guidelines:

"Can a product be labeled “organic” without being certified? If you make a product and want to claim that it or its ingredients are organic, your final product probably needs to be certified."

"If you are not certified, you must not make any organic claim on the principal display panel or use the USDA organic seal anywhere on the package. (see exemption below)"

"You may only, on the information panel, identify the certified organic ingredients as organic and the percentage of organic ingredients."

Apparently, if a company does mislabel its products, it is liable to be prosecuted by the Federal trade commission.

[–] thereisalamp@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

If you make a product and want to claim that it or its ingredients are organic, your final product probably needs to be certified.

That word probably exists in the same article you originally linked.

But many actually don't do it which is why they don't use the USDA certified

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You realize I can slap the word organic on anything, and it isn’t using the certified organic label… right? Want some “organic ATX motherboards?” I gotchu.

[–] iceonfire1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you're not afraid of the legal system why not slap a Disney logo on there too?

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Looks like they refer to adding their Science wing into the streaming, too.

In this crazy capitalist world peiple started forgetting that public services can be free, like, for real :D

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

*Paid for with taxes, not free.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That goes without saying.

It's free for the end consumer and everyone knows that it is paid with taxes. So saying free is just easier.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

But the Libertarians always have to say it. Nevermind that anything free from a corporation is paid for though advertising, or selling your data, or folded into the item cost, or future purchases, so by this strict definition that “someone is paying for it” means literally nothing is ever free.

It has to be said EVERY TIME someone mentions that public services are offered at no charge.

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 12 points 1 year ago

If I need to pay taxes anyway, at least I prefer to have the investment returned back to me in some way, and this seems like a nice way to do so.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jokes on you, I'm not an American so it really is free for me!

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 3 points 1 year ago

Well it's free for me!

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Everyone knows that... that's what they mean by free, free to use. Why do you think people don't know this? Did you just figure it out or something? Are you seriously that slow?

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

plus just means more I think, they're adding to their service so it's "plus"

just because that's usually a hook to get you to pay more doesn't mean that's now the definition of the word

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're selling our usage data to aliens to pay for server costs

[–] flerp@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

What do you expect? "We're not hosting an intergalactic kegger down here!"

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What other "plus" apps have a non plus version though? Stone Disney+ it's just become "the thing" that streaming services go by now

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disney had a several tv channels and an app that was free for subscribers when they launched Disney+ but I don't know if they still have the old app.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The "free" apps require a cable subscription, so they aren't really free.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, maybe "included for subscribers" is probably a better description.

[–] Strobelt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mauve for this you'll need to have an account? This would already help nasa market products towards you and this is a good value they can get without you paying anything.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mauve you're right, mauve you're not, mauve I'll see for myself.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

suddenly neopronouns