this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
25 points (93.1% liked)

GenZedong

4302 readers
158 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean, the death of the state is the end goal, but in a way where society is too advanced and educated to need it. I have a hard time imagining where central planning is decentralized over time, or if central planning can somehow operate in a stateless society.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This, more or less. Class oppression will disappear, which eliminates the state by definition. Some kind of governance/administration will still exist, and central planning will likely still exist, but all operations of the "government" (whatever form it takes) will be transparent and everyone involved will be subject to constant public scrutiny and the risk of replacement if they're ineffective. Some kind of law enforcement will also likely still exist, with similar transparency and democratic control

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only after achieving an international state free of reactionary *logies can the state begin to wither away imo.

[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

yes, it's extremely unlikely to happen before imperialism has been eradicated