47
submitted 10 months ago by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Weeks? Months? Years? Any other interesting experiences?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

A lot of people think that wolf packs have an “alpha” wolf, but wolf experts will tell you that’s a myth.

OP said they read that weed makes you not dream. I happen to know from my education that is not the case.

Sometimes X really doesn’t happen. I never claimed to know everything, but I do know this.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 10 months ago

And I happen to know from my experience that it does.

One example of a phenomenon happening is sufficient evidence to overturn claims of the form “X doesn’t happen”.

If your education convinced you that you can eliminate the possibility of things happening entirely, then you were mis-educated.

[-] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

It's not clear which point OP made that you're claiming is inaccurate.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

The claim I’m saying is inaccurate is this:

That little factoid is a falsehood

… which referred to OP’s implication that weed makes you not dream, followed by intense dreams when weed is discontinued.

The “factoid” is true because it’s happened to me repeatedly.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No, I’m afraid you don’t know how scientific claims work. The OP read a claim that “weed makes you not dream.” They didn’t read a claim that “some people report not dreaming after they’ve gone to sleep after smoking weed,” it was a blanket statement about an effect of marijuana.

The fact that you have gone to sleep after smoking and not remembered your dreams afterward does not mean it was the weed that did it, and it certainly doesn’t mean it has that affect on most people, let alone everybody. The issue isn’t that the OP’s claim is true because it happened to you; this is why anecdotal evidence is not accepted as a basis for factual claims in science. There are too many potential confounding factors in any individual case. Plenty of people claim to have seen ghosts; that doesn’t mean ghosts exist.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
47 points (87.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26275 readers
1477 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS