0
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 May 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
GenZedong
4242 readers
89 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Thankfully they didn't end both mean and spineless.
Explaining the dialectic triad can be complicated (as it is to explain anything coming from Hegel) especially as I have found that simplifying your explanation too much can distort the idea you are trying to transmit, but often I find success explaining hegelian dialectics the way Hegel intended (as the constant movement forward of ideas) and the way I had it explained to me: gravitational theory.
After this you can then explain how Marx refuses this explanation to be applied only to ideas, brings dialectics to the material world and so on and so on.