48
submitted 11 months ago by grandpaST@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
  1. Being dropped 500 years ago into your ancestors' community.
  2. Being dropped 500 years into the future in your community.

You have a day to source some clothing appropriate to the time period. Unfortunately, that's not enough time to learn a dialect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Well with scenario 1, it would be fairly quick because people speak way different now than 500 years ago.

[-] grandpaST@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They will also likely speak way different in 500 years than we do now. We have an idea what 1523 English sounded like. 2523 is uncharted territory.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Hell, I have trouble understanding young people right now. I'm not trying to dunk on them, I'm just old.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago
[-] sour@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

61 6D 20 73 6F 75 72 20 2E 5F 2E

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago
[-] sour@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

because random name generator

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago

We have an idea what 1523 English sounded like.

In the early 2000s the Globe in London did productions of Shakespeare in the original pronunciation.

Here is how the opening of Romeo and Juliet would have sounded.

[-] livus@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

He does for this in.

Yes, there is a definite similarity there.

[-] OneStepAhead@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 11 months ago

Pretty neat. I think I caught about half of that. I’m now wondering what percentage of that was more difficult to understand than an average persons speech. I don’t generally talk in iambic pentameter or what-have-you. The flow of the words for something like this is likely making it harder to understand than “regular talk”

[-] livus@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

I agree. Also, if the climate catastrophe unfolds as predicted, there will be a return to intense regionalization of dialects because people will live in smaller groups and have less contact with outsiders.

European colonization of America wouldn't have started yet so a majority of Americans wouldn't even be on the same continent. Most of us wouldn't even speak the same language as our ancestors. My ancestors would most likely understand English but wouldn't speak it as their primary language. That may somewhat disguise the dialect difference but would cause all sorts of other problems. They may be actively fighting a war with England or they may be in a period of uneasy peace getting ready for the next war with England.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For real shits and giggles:

You get dropped exactly where you are now, just 500 years ago. All the European descended people not living in Europe are (very likely) in for a bad time.

[-] livus@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Probably not a bad time in the places that had never seen them. It's only the people who they'd already been dicks to by 1523 that you'd need to worry about.

I actually looked this one up, there was no settlement of any kind right on this spot, so I'd have time to sort myself out before approaching a settlement a few days' journey.

[-] grandpaST@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Ya, that's why I worded it that way. I wouldn't survive a week landing in midwest North America in 1523. Assuming civilization somehow continues for 500 more years, you would attract much less attention in scenario 2.

I'm in western Appalachia. There were no human settlements here but I might run into a group of hunters. I feel like I'm pretty decent in nature. I've been hunting, hiking, and camping in this area my whole life. With no modern equipment I give myself about a week. Most likely cause of death: Snakebite or eaten by wolves.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

You could play dumb.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
48 points (94.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26700 readers
2154 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics.


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS