20

I read something along the lines of "the civilian casualties of the Battle of Stalingrad is partially an example of the faults of Soviet centralized planning, as the state was not able to provide food, transport, housing, etc. in the time and numbers required." I am wondering what the response to this claim would be?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago

There were all kinds of complications. For example they had limited boats to ferry people to safety. These boats operated night and day under mortar and artillery fire as well as air attacks. Later on under direct fire when the Germans took parts of the Volga beachhead. Then when it got colder chunks of ice floating in the current made the waters even more treacherous to navigate.

I'd argue that it was exactly the centralized planning that enabled the Red Army to muster the forces necessary to counterattack and encircle the Germans in such depth that they couldn't break out or be rescued by an outside force.

The idea that keeping civilians in the city would probably make the Soviet soldiers fight harder probably lead to a lot of preventable deaths but that order has nothing to do with central planning.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22749 readers
427 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS