this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
51 points (93.2% liked)

Palestine

990 readers
65 users here now

A community for everything related to Palestine and the occupation currently underway by the occupying force known as Israel.

Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. Existence is resistance for Palestinians.

Please refer to Israel as Occupied Palestine, or occupied territories. The IDF is a fascist and ethnonationalist occupying force. Israelis are settlers. We understand however that the imperial narrative (which tries to legitimise Israel) is internalised in the imperial core and slip-ups are naturally expected.

We always take the sides of Palestine and Palestinians and are unapologetic about it. Israel is an occupying power whose "defence force"'s (note the contradiction) sole purpose for existing is to push Palestinians out so they can resettle their rightful land. If you have anything positive to say about Israel we do not care.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml
AYJANIBRAHIMOV@lemmygrad.ml
stink@lemmygrad.ml
51
Why do liberals condemn both Hamas and Israel? What is the point of doing that? What are they scheming? (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 11 months ago by VictimOfAmerikkka@lemmygrad.ml to c/palestine@lemmygrad.ml
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cucumovirus@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 11 months ago

Also: https://redsails.org/the-pitfalls-of-liberalism/

The most perturbing question for the liberal is the question of violence. The liberal’s initial reaction to violence is to try to convince the oppressed that violence is an incorrect tactic, that violence will not work, that violence never accomplishes anything.

The liberal is so preoccupied with stopping confrontation that he usually finds himself defending and calling for law and order, the law and order of the oppressor. Confrontation would disrupt the smooth functioning of the society and so the politics of the liberal leads him into a position where he finds himself politically aligned with the oppressor rather than with the oppressed.

The reason the liberal seeks to stop confrontation — and this is the second pitfall of liberalism — is that his role, regardless of what he says, is really to maintain the status quo, rather than to change it.